Surprise! Babies learn best from the unexpected
When babies confront something surprising, they want to figure out what happened—and that curiosity helps them learn.
If an object behaves differently from what a baby anticipates, he or she not only focuses on that object, but also ultimately learns more about it than from a similar but more predictable object, new research shows.
“For young learners, the world is an incredibly complex place filled with dynamic stimuli,” says Lisa Feigenson, professor of psychological and brain sciences at Johns Hopkins University. “How do learners know what to focus on and learn more about, and what to ignore?
“Our research suggests that infants use what they already know about the world to form predictions. When these predictions are shown to be wrong, infants use this as a special opportunity for learning.”
It is, she says, “as though they are taking the occasion to try to figure something out about their world.”
For a new study, Feigenson and graduate student Aimee E. Stahl conducted four experiments with preverbal 11-month-old babies.
Babies were shown either predictable or surprising situations. For instance, one group of infants saw a ball roll down a ramp and appear to be stopped by a wall in its path. Another group saw the ball roll down the ramp and appear to pass—as if by magic—right through the wall.
Testing the surprise
When the researchers gave babies new information about a surprising ball, the babies learned that information significantly better. In fact, the infants who saw the predictable ball showed no evidence of learning.
The babies chose to explore a ball that defied expectations even more than toys that were brand new but had not done anything surprising.
Further, the babies didn’t just learn more about surprising objects—they wanted to understand them, too.
For instance, when babies saw the ball appear to pass through the wall, they tested the ball’s solidity by banging it on the table. But when babies saw a different surprising event, in which the ball appeared to hover in midair, they tested gravity by dropping the ball and watching it hit the floor.
These results suggest that babies were testing specific hypotheses about the objects’ surprising behavior.
“The infants’ behaviors are not merely reflexive responses to the novelty of surprising outcomes, but instead reflect deeper attempts to learn about aspects of the world that failed to accord with expectations,” says Stahl, lead author of the study in Science.
“Infants are not only equipped with core knowledge about fundamental aspects of the world, but from early in their lives, they harness this knowledge to empower new learning.”
The National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship supported the work.
Source: Johns Hopkins University