Society & Culture - Posted by Steve McGaughey-Illinois on Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:30 - 4 Comments 
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...
(No Ratings Yet) Loading ...Why our intuitions are often wrong
A new book argues that cognitive abilities aren't always what they're cracked up to be, and this misperception of ability can often lead to negative consequences when it comes to life decisions.
U. ILLINOIS (US)—We may think we’re a good judge of character, observant, and perceptive, but research by two psychologist suggests we’re almost certainly not as good at those skills as we think we are.
Share this article
Email
Republish this article
The text of this article by Futurity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License.
In their new book, The Invisible Gorilla and Other Ways Our Intuitions Deceive Us, Dan Simons, professor of psychology at the University of Illinois, and colleague Christopher Chablis of Union College, discuss visual cognition, which explores the brain mechanisms that govern visual attention. The researcher want to learn more about how what we see (or don’t see) influences our perceptions of ourselves and of the world.
The book tackles “six everyday illusions that profoundly influence our lives,” the authors write: “the illusions of attention, memory, confidence, knowledge, cause, and potential.”
“The focus of our book is on the ways in which our intuitions about the mind are fundamentally wrong a lot of the time,” Simons says. “We tend to think our intuitions are fantastic, and they’re terrible. And that has consequences.”
The researchers argue that cognitive abilities aren’t nearly as reliable as we think they are, and that disconnect can have negative consequences when it comes to not only life decisions, but perceptions about controversial topics in popular culture.
The research began as a “simple psychology experiment” illustrated in a video called “Gorillas in our Midst.” The video is an example of “inattentional blindness,” the failure to see something obvious because one’s cognitive resources are devoted to something else.
Simons and Chablis maintain that people do in fact miss much of what goes on in the visual world while at the same time overestimating their cognitive abilities.
The book uses both scientific results and anecdotal evidence to show that our intuitions about the world are often based on cognitive abilities such as memory and attention that are limited by the capacities of our brains and visual systems.
The authors’ perspective is one that goes against the trend of self-help and other popular psychology books that often advise readers to trust their intuitions and that the brain has great untapped potential.
Simons and Chablis use scientific studies going back more than a decade showing that people in numerous situations, including everyday ones such as financial decisions, often make the wrong choices based on intuition and cognitive abilities that are much less reliable than they believe.
Overestimation of one’s cognitive abilities, such as an illusion of attention prowess, can even be dangerous, Simon says.
“So it’s kind of a self-delusion, but without knowing that you’re doing anything to delude yourself,” he says. “Such delusions can lead people to do dangerous things with a false sense of security, such as talk or text on a cell phone while driving.”
More news from the University of Illinois: www.beckman.illinois.edu/
Please wait
4 Comments
Jill
One of the best pieces of advice that I ever received was : Before making a decision about anything, take a deep breath and think about it for a couple of minutes. Just that couple of minutes of concentration about something, makes a huge difference because it allows the mind to co-ordinate “gut instinct” and higher level cognitive functions.
sherry
Thank you for making that distinction, Mr. Wolfe.
You’re welcome. You might want to check out some of our other thoughts on viewing other business aspects (and life aspects) through the lens of what we cal The Living Organization(R). It creates a framework that ties together many pieces for creating what we want.
You can visit our blog at http://www.quantumleadersblog.com and also download a whitepaper at http://quantumleaders.com/html/resources_whitepapers.htm?tlo=checked.
Thank you for posting the original blog.
Norman
Words are rather interesting tools by which we communicate, and don’t communicate at the same time. A word like intuition is used here in one context and yet in other contexts takes on a different meaning. Intuition here (if I understand it not having read the book) is referring to our ability to trust, or not trust what we perceive. It is referring to our ability to be cognitively accurate versus projecting what we think is there when in fact it is not. This has more to do with our brains capacity to fill in or leave out pieces of data as we create the patterns we call reality. This is more oriented towards how well we accurately collect sense oriented information versus filling in sense oriented information
The other context of intuition is one which refers to our ability to pick up information from sources other than our senses. Those pieces of insight to a problem we are solving that alludes us, but in a flash of insight (in the shower moments as some call it) when all of a sudden we get the very piece alluding us. Or those gut feelings that give us a sense of a thing that transcends our cognitive processes.
I have to ask whether the first context validates or invalidates the second context? Maybe we should use different words for the two contexts?