Society & Culture - Posted by Carole Gan-UC Davis on Wednesday, March 13, 2013 13:48 - 0 Comments
Use retailers to curb illegal gun sales
UC DAVIS (US) — Retailers take a dim view of their colleagues who buy or sell guns illegally—regardless of whether they are actively breaking the law or simply looking the other way.
A new survey is believed to be the first scientific study of a large group of gun retailers to determine their attitudes on illegal gun sales—such as “straw” or surrogate purchases, and undocumented purchases—and other criminal activity among buyers and retailers.
“There is a continuing debate on the commerce of firearms: which ones should be sold and who they should be sold to. But no one has ever gotten the opinions of the people doing the selling,” says Garen Wintemute, professor of emergency medicine at the University of California, Davis.
Straight from the Source
“We wanted to collect detailed information about firearm retailers and get their sense of how often illegal activity occurs and what should be done about the problem.”
For the study, published in the journal Injury Prevention, Wintemute surveyed 1,601 of 9,720 dealers, pawnbrokers, and gunsmiths who sold 50 or more firearms each year. The survey asked retailers how often they thought customers were trying to make straw purchases, or buying a gun for someone who is ineligible to own one.
It also asked how often customers tried to purchase a gun without filling out appropriate forms or receiving a background check and how often retailers had refused to make a sale or alerted other retailers about an attempted illegal purchase.
The survey showed that 67.3 percent had experienced an attempted straw purchase in the previous year, while 42.4 percent had experienced an attempted undocumented purchase. In all, participants reported 2,051 attempted straw purchases and 2,254 attempted undocumented purchases.
Pawnbrokers reported greater numbers of both. The survey also found that theft was a common occurrence; more than 25 percent of respondents reported that they had experienced theft in the previous five years.
Extrapolating from this data, Wintemute estimates that the 9,720 retailers who were eligible for the study experienced nearly 34,000 attempted straw purchases and 37,000 attempted undocumented purchases.
Generally, participants refused to complete illegal sales but only notified law enforcement or alerted other retailers 75 percent of the time. However, when asked about sentencing, retailers often specified long sentences, for both customers and retailers.
For a retailer who sold 50 weapons to traffickers, the median recommended sentence was 10 years; the median fine was $50,000. The retailers indicated they would impose the same sentences on buyers.
“The sentences they recommended were often harsher than current law,” Wintemute says. “Many felt bad retailers should face stiffer sentences than customers. Also, the survey gave participants the opportunity to let their peers off the hook: if they were in a tough community or afraid for their safety. But the retailers did not do that. They laid responsibility directly on the person who committed the crime.”
In addition, 59.5 percent of respondents believed that retailers who often have firearms used in a crime traced back to their store are not asking enough questions and probably know these sales are illegal.
“Even after factoring in their sales volume, a small number of retailers sold a disproportionate share of the traced guns,” Wintemute says. He also suggests this minority could be a prime focus for law enforcement.
At present, there are three bills before Congress that would clarify and strengthen laws to prevent straw purchases and other illegal sales activity. Wintemute believes retailers could help Congress and other legislative bodies devise equitable gun laws.
“I think gun retailers are a vastly underused resource,” he says. “The majority do not want bad apples in their industry. We should look for ways to collaborate with them to identify and prosecute bad guys in their industry.”
The research was funded by grants from The California Wellness Foundation and the Joyce Foundation.
Source: UC Davis