Society & Culture - Posted by Emma Thorne-Nottingham on Wednesday, October 31, 2012 14:25 - 2 Comments 
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...
(No Ratings Yet) Loading ...Smokers take 2.7 extra sick days
A recent study finds that smoking is clearly tied to workers' short-term absences as well as leaves of four weeks or more. (Credit: iStockphoto)
U. NOTTINGHAM (UK) — Smokers are 33 percent more likely to miss work than non-smokers and were absent an average of 2.7 extra days a year, research shows.
Share this article
Email
Republish this article
The text of this article by Futurity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License.
According to a new study, smokers are costing the UK economy £1.4 billion by taking an average of two or three days more sick leave per year than their non-smoking colleagues.
“Quitting smoking appears to reduce absenteeism and result in substantial cost savings for employers,” says Jo Leonardi-Bee, a University of Nottingham researcher who conducted the study with colleague Stephen Weng.
The findings emphasized the importance of encouraging smokers to quit; doing so could help to reverse some of the lost-work trends, as figures showed that current smokers were still 19 percent more likely to miss work than ex-smokers.
The report, published in the journal Addiction, analyzed 29 separate studies conducted between 1960 and 2011 in Europe, Australia, New Zealand, the United States and Japan, covering more than 71,000 public and private sector workers.
Researchers asked workers about their current and former smoking habits and used surveys or medical and employee records to track how often they were absent over an average of two years.
Smoking was clearly tied to workers’ short-term absences as well as leaves of four weeks or more, according to the study.
The £1.4 billion pounds lost in the UK due to smoking-related absenteeism was only one of the numerous costs of smoking in the workplace, according to Leonardi-Bee and her colleagues. Others costs included productivity lost to smoking breaks and the cost of cigarette-related fire damage.
However, the researchers add, further study is needed to examine which interventions are cost-effective for employers to aid smokers to quit.
Source: University of Nottingham
Please wait
2 Comments
Robin
Mike
1.4 billion since the study began in 1960? Thats quite minimal. And how much more money do smokers contribute in taxes?
This article was clearly written by a non-smoker. I am a smoker and I have not had a day off sick for over three years. I also fail to see the connection between somebody having more than their fair share of sick days and smoking. I know plenty of non-smokers who regularly fail to attend work, which I’m sure costs the government more money each year than smoking related absenteeism.