Share this article

 Email

 Print

 

Republish this article

The text of this article by Futurity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License.

More
Society & Culture

Is US drone policy illegal and ill-advised?

Survey: Mixed feelings in Florida over immigration

Tool gives hi-def origin of Syrian artifacts

Did abrupt climate change spark human culture?

To be perfect, practice isn’t enough

Early bilinguals pick up two ‘sound systems’

Strong guys less willing to share wealth

Kindergarten math lessons are ‘old news’

Kids aren’t kind to chubby cartoons

Research led by a University of Rochester Medical Center psychologist and published by the Journal of Individual Differences finds that the characteristics associated with coolness today are markedly different than those that generated the concept of cool.

“When I set out to find what people mean by coolness, I wanted to find corroboration of what I thought coolness was,” says Ilan Dar-Nimrod, lead author of the study. “I was not prepared to find that coolness has lost so much of its historical origins and meaning—the very heavy countercultural, somewhat individualistic pose I associated with cool.

“James Dean is no longer the epitome of cool,” Dar-Nimrod says. “The much darker version of what coolness is still there, but it is not the main focus. The main thing is: Do I like this person? Is this person nice to people, attractive, confident and successful? That’s cool today, at least among young mainstream individuals.”

In research that has developed over several years, Dar-Nimrod, currently a post-doctoral fellow in the Medical Center’s Department of Psychiatry, and his colleagues recruited almost 1,000 people in the Vancouver, British Columbia, area, who completed an extensive questionnaire on the attributes, behaviors, and individuals they associated with the word cool.

The researchers say the study is the first systematic, quantitative examination of which characteristics recur in popular understandings of the cool personality.

The researchers conducted three separate studies. In Study 1, participants generated characteristics that they perceived to be cool. In Study 2, two samples of participants rated dozens of these characteristics on two dimensions: coolness and social desirability. In Study 3, participants rated friends both on their coolness and on a variety of personality descriptors that were identified as relevant in the other studies.

A significant number of participants used adjectives that focused on positive, socially desirable traits, such as friendly, competent, trendy, and attractive.

“I got my first sunglasses when I was about 13,” says Dar-Nimrod. “There wasn’t a cooler kid on the block for the next few days. I was looking cool because I was distant from people. My emotions were not something they could read. I put a filter between me and everyone else. That, in my mind, made me cool.

“Today, that doesn’t seem to be supported. If anything, sociability is considered to be cool, being nice is considered to be cool. And in an oxymoron, being passionate is considered to be cool—at least, it is part of the dominant perception of what coolness is. How can you combine the idea of cool—emotionally controlled and distant—with passionate?”

At some levels, participants in the study still appreciated the traditional elements of cool, such as rebelliousness and detachment, but not as strongly as friendliness and warmth.

“We have a kind of a schizophrenic coolness concept in our mind,” Dar-Nimrod says. “Almost any one of us will be cool in some people’s eyes, which suggests the idiosyncratic way coolness is evaluated. But some will be judged as cool in many people’s eyes, which suggests there is a core valuation to coolness, and today that does not seem to be the historical nature of cool.

“We suggest there is some transition from the countercultural cool to a generic version of it’s good and I like it. But this transition is by no way completed.”

Dar-Nimrod’s main research interests are the effects of genetics and social environment on decision-making and health behaviors. The coolness research began when Dar-Nimrod was a doctoral student at the University of British Columbia. He and a fellow student, Ian G. Hansen, a co-author of the article and currently an assistant professor at York College of City University of New York, argued over whether Steve Buscemi, an actor in the movie Fargo and the cable television series Boardwalk Empire, is cool.

“Ian thought Buscemi was cool and I could not accept him as cool because he was so unattractive and seemed such a weasel,” Dar-Nimrod says. “That got us thinking about just what coolness is.”

The coolness findings could point to possible health impacts.

“Coolness may have some relevance to health behaviors,” Dar-Nimrod says. “Smoking or drug use, for example, could be connected with a view of coolness that includes rebelliousness or a countercultural stance. This can inform future health research on behaviors. Is coolness related to people’s choice of unhealthy behaviors, such body modifications, unprotected sex or even eating behaviors?”

In addition to Dar-Nimrod and Hansen, study authors include researchers at Tilburg University in The Netherlands, the University of British Columbia, and the University of Rochester Medical Center.

More news from the University of Rochester: www.rochester.edu/news