Society & Culture - Posted by Kelly Parkes-Harrison-Warwick on Monday, August 6, 2012 10:03 - 3 Comments 
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...
(No Ratings Yet) Loading ...Facebook popularity may hurt good causes
"As well as relying on others to pass on information, it may also be true that people are even relying on others to donate," says economist Kimberley Scharf, who says people with more Facebook friends are less likely to share charity information. (Credit: iStockphoto)
U. WARWICK (UK) — People with more Facebook friends are less likely to share information about charitable causes, according to a new study.
Share this article
Email
Republish this article
The text of this article by Futurity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License.
Economist Kimberley Scharf, from the Centre for Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE) at the University of Warwick, claims when we have larger online social networks we rely on other people to pass on information about opportunities to give. This phenomenon is called “free riding”.
Straight from the Source
Scharf also suggests we may even rely on others to donate. She will present her research in Dresden at the 2012 International Institute of Public Finance Congress on August 16-19.
In the paper, she develops an economic model of giving where people share overlapping social neighbors.
Scharf says: “For example, with Facebook I have friends and my friends have friends. I wanted to see if the number of social connections individuals have affects the way that information about quality of charity provision is diffused, and if it does, what the implications are for total giving.
“Information transmission about giving opportunities is undermined by ‘free riding’ incentives—I count on other neighbors to convey information and so save on the effort of doing it myself.
“If there is less information flowing about who are the more effective charities, then not all donations will be going to the best performing charity and there will be a reduction in the charitable good or service. As well as relying on others to pass on information, it may also be true that people are even relying on others to donate.”
Scharf says her study shows there is more giving in smaller, closer-knit groups of individuals who share common interests.
She says: “This is what matters, the closeness of social interactions: large loosely connected groups share information less effectively than smaller, better integrated groups.
“Economists have traditionally viewed giving as an individual choice. It is time for a rethink—we are long overdue in asking questions about how social connections shape giving. The answers are important, they will help us understand how better to target private and public resources aimed at promoting giving.”
Scharf adds social interactions are not always good for giving. People may share information about worthy causes or good providers, but if there are too many people sharing information, the messages could get lost in the noise of the crowd.
More news from University of Warwick: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/newsandevents/
Please wait
3 Comments
queen c
Tumaini George Mbaga
I am the Director of WODEF nonprofit organization in Tanzania I seek partnership volunteers to join with us for supporting our nonprofit organization, in this time we put our effort in EDUCATION PROJECT TO THE ORPHANS AND FORSAKEN CHILDREN,manyara region we are it is a so poor region,many orphans and forseken children are fail to reaching their better future because of poverty,now we have started already 2 kindergarten schools which we seek volunteers partners to support these kids, also we have a big numbers of orphans and forsaken kids in primary schools whom they need our support in EDUCATION please join with us for supporting your friend Pastor Tumaini George Mbaga the Director
nerf herder
This article isn’t really specific to Facebook. They used that as a test bed, but it seems to me this would apply to any social media, whether it’s membership in a church, university classmates or what-have-you. A smaller group of people with a common interest will quickly share things they know interest others. A larger diverse group of people will not get that same level of involvement. The title is rather misleading, jumping on the bandwagon to blame yet another social ill on Facebook. (Not that I’m defending Facebook, it has its own ills, no doubt, just don’t call it a charity-killer).
great article& good point. facebookers talk about themselves while those who tweet share more information. funny though…. your article appears to already have 1 Facebook like!! lol!!