Share this article

 Email

 Print

 

Republish this article

The text of this article by Futurity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License.

More
Society & Culture

Better coaches teach character, not ego, to kids

Thinking ‘time is money’ can spoil time off

Count votes by hand, and error adds up

Online dating dumps the stigma

For online news portals, credibility counts

Caught in scandal, Wall Street plays blame game

Rural hot spots point to terrorism threats

Intervene early to cut college drinking

Homeless curb drinking with open alcohol policy

U. BUFFALO (US)—While detailed contracts can foster trust between parties, there needs to be flexibility in negotiating potential changes, according to research recently published in MIS Quarterly.

The study focused on specific contracts, known as service level agreements (SLAs), between IT outsourcing vendors and clients, and was conducted by an international team of researchers that included Rajiv Kishore, associate professor, and H. Raghav Rao, professor, at the University at Buffalo School of Management.

The authors expanded on previous research refuting the notion that contracts are antithetical to trust. They found that the more detailed the SLA, the greater the degree of trust and commitment between the two parties.

The very process of crafting detailed SLAs works to build and reinforce trust between clients and vendors, according to the researchers. Also, both parties know what behaviors to expect from each other during the course of delivery on the outsourcing contract.

However, a unique insight of the study is that it is better not to be too specific in the SLA with respect to clauses that deal with anticipating and planning for contractual changes.

“Attempting to specify all potential changes and change processes through complex clauses in the contract only serves to tie the hands of the two parties,” says Kishore. “This may reduce the trust of the two parties in each other.”

All contracts have an element of uncertainty, according to Kishore. “Contractual changes to deal with uncertainty can be most effectively implemented through an adaptive process of negotiation,” he says. “This way, mutual give and take can occur across the table rather than through detailed, standardized clauses specified in the contract.”

Researchers from Florida Atlantic University and Sogang University in Seoul, Korea, contributed to the study.

University at Buffalo news: www.buffalo.edu/news/