<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can eyewitnesses trust their memory?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futurity.org/society-culture/can-eyewitnesses-trust-their-memory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futurity.org/society-culture/can-eyewitnesses-trust-their-memory/</link>
	<description>Research news from leading universities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:52:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Vernier</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/society-culture/can-eyewitnesses-trust-their-memory/comment-page-1/#comment-1797</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Vernier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurity.org/?p=5601#comment-1797</guid>
		<description>Eyewitness identification is usually a somewhat intense process. Ever-present are several often ignored 
factors as have been described in the works of Dr.Elizabeth F.Loftus and a number of her peers. Many of these same factors can lead the fact gathering scientist into erroneous conclusions. 
There is however one element rarely if ever acknowledged and that is the Expectancy Affect. It&#039;s tendrils are subtle and known to have great length. And it&#039;s a pistol to eliminate from the experimental environment.

One could only hope that Professor Wells  is aware of and prepared to neutralize the multitude of  traps that could skew his end results.
I am intimately aware of the flaws inherent in eye-witness identification and testimony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eyewitness identification is usually a somewhat intense process. Ever-present are several often ignored<br />
factors as have been described in the works of Dr.Elizabeth F.Loftus and a number of her peers. Many of these same factors can lead the fact gathering scientist into erroneous conclusions.<br />
There is however one element rarely if ever acknowledged and that is the Expectancy Affect. It&#8217;s tendrils are subtle and known to have great length. And it&#8217;s a pistol to eliminate from the experimental environment.</p>
<p>One could only hope that Professor Wells  is aware of and prepared to neutralize the multitude of  traps that could skew his end results.<br />
I am intimately aware of the flaws inherent in eye-witness identification and testimony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

