Society & Culture - Posted by Timothy Wall-Missouri on Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:56 - 2 Comments
Alcohol images may prompt racial bias

"Walking by a bar or seeing an ad for beer could be enough to affect someone’s mindset. You don’t have to be aware of the effects for it to affect you," says psychologist Bruce D. Bartholow. (Credit: neon sign via Shutterstock)
U. MISSOURI (US) — A new study shows that simply being exposed to alcohol-related images can lead to increased expression of racial bias.
Recent research by University of Missouri Professor of Psychological Sciences Bruce D. Bartholow has shown that consuming alcohol can lead to increased expression of racial bias. His latest study, conducted with colleague Elena Stepanova of Florida Gulf Coast University, shows that images can have the same effect, even when no alcohol is consumed.
“Simply seeing images of alcohol, but not drinking it, influences behaviors like racial bias on a subconscious level,” Bartholow says. “Walking by a bar or seeing an ad for beer could be enough to affect someone’s mindset. You don’t have to be aware of the effects for it to affect you.”
The recent study, published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, found that participants who had initially viewed a series of magazine ads for alcoholic beverages made more errors indicative of racial bias in a subsequent task than did others who had initially seen ads for non-alcoholic beverages, such as water or coffee.
Test participants were shown a series of ads for either alcoholic or non-alcoholic beverages. They then completed a computerized task in which pictures of white and black men’s faces were shown for a split second, followed immediately by either a picture of a handgun or a tool.
Numerous previous studies using this same task have shown that people often mistakenly identify tools as guns following presentation of a black face, a response pattern attributed to the effects of racial stereotypes. The fast pace of the experiment kept participants from thinking about their responses, which allowed the subconscious mind to control reactions.
In the real world, snap decisions in which one object is mistaken for another can be deadly.
“As for the Trayvon Martin case, it very much reminds me of the Amadou Diallo case in 1999, when an unarmed black individual was shot to death by New York City police officers,” Stepanova says. “Diallo was shot because officers claimed that they thought he pulled a gun, while in fact he reached for his wallet. The wallet was misconstrued as a gun by police officers.
“Associations between blacks and guns, violence and criminal behavior played a role in Mr. Martin’s case,” Stepanova says. “Mr. Martin was essentially a victim of racial stereotypes that so many in our society hold, and that cost him his life.”
The results of Bartholow and Stepanova’s study don’t mean that every test participant was a racist, however.
“Even if people do their best to be open-minded, we are all aware of stereotypes,” Bartholow says. “Participants’ responses could have been due to associations they are aware of but don’t personally endorse. Also the results could be influenced by people’s ability to control their behaviors. A member of the KKK could hide his prejudice if he had good control of his responses.”
Analysis of the results showed people’s automatic, subconscious behaviors were most affected after seeing an alcohol ad, whereas earlier studies found actually drinking alcohol most influenced conscious, controlled reactions.
Bartholow suggests the mental associations people have with the effects of drinking alcohol may have been what caused their increased expression of racial bias after seeing alcohol ads. Upon seeing alcohol, they subconsciously felt they could relax their inhibitions and allow their behaviors to be more influenced by stereotypes.
The study was led by Elena Stepanova, a post-doctoral fellow in Bartholow’s lab, now a professor of social and behavioral science at Florida Gulf Coast University.
Bartholow’s research focuses on basic aspects of social cognition as well as how social and environmental factors, along with individual differences, contribute to alcohol involvement among young adults.
More news from the University of Missouri: http://munews.missouri.edu/
Please wait
2 Comments
bea
Hi there, I would like to subscribe for this web
site to take latest updates, therefore where can i do it please help.
























I wonder how valid this study is. There could be sources for error in such studies. In fact, this type of study they conducted is often questioned by psychologists, scientists… I took similar test where I had to press certain keys on the keyboard after viewing an item, a cue, and after viewing a picture of a human face (either of a black or a white person) and also press appropriate key. It had to be done rather quickly with either finger, placed appropriately, depending on the cues and the ‘answer’. The sources of bias or error could possibly come from: a) the participant not ‘fluent’ in keyboarding – thus needing to look at the keyboard at times to make sure the fingers are positioned or b) the participant was exposed to stereotypes (anytime) before participating in the study and thus answer whatever the thought each cue activated in the person’s brain. If they took a person not familiar with the common stereotypes, the result could have been totally different than it was.