What’s to blame for dirty snow?
Sometimes snow is not as white as it looks. A new large-scale survey shows that agricultural practices, not just smokestacks and tailpipes, may have a big impact on its purity.
Researchers made an epic 10,000 mile trek across North American snow fields to see if tiny, dark particles of pollution that mix with reflective flakes might be just enough to speed melt rates and influence climate.
For the study, researchers were particularly interested in the Bakken oil fields of northwest North Dakota and found that snow away from cities is similar to Arctic snow in many places. They found more pollution in the United States’ Great Plains.
“With all this oil exploration, diesel trucks, and new oil wells, people wondered: is there a huge amount of air pollution making the snowpack darker?” says lead author Sarah Doherty, a research scientist at the Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean at University of Washington.
Black carbon in snow
Researchers discovered that these activities do appear to be adding extra soot to the snow, but perhaps just as important is the dirt.
Disturbance from clearing oil pads, new housing sites, and all the extra truck traffic on unpaved roads means dirtier snow.
But even away from the oil fields, soil is disturbed by agriculture.
“Our work suggests that land use and farming practices might matter as much as diesel emissions in many parts of the Great Plains,” Doherty says.
Doherty and colleagues spent the winter of 2013 driving across northwestern US states and some Canadian provinces to get a firsthand look at the continent’s snow.
The project involved collecting hundreds of snow samples from 67 sites away from any cities or major roads. The trip took the researchers from Seattle to North Dakota to Churchill, Manitoba. Every few days they melted and filtered the snow in their motel rooms, then back at the lab they shone light through a filter to see how much light was blocked, and did chemical analyses to determine what particles were responsible.
Their main focus was black carbon, a very light-absorbing particle emitted by burning diesel, coal or wood. Many countries have regulated black carbon because of its effects on air quality and human health, but more recently climate scientists also have become interested because the tiny particles darken the snow and hasten melting.
Who has the cleanest snow?
The cleanest samples they collected were from northern Canada, with overall levels of black carbon, or soot, similar to that of Arctic snowpack.
The Pacific Northwest and Rocky Mountain states had levels slightly higher. The Great Plains readings were more variable and sometimes two to three or more times higher than in other parts of the country, typically 15 to 70 nanograms of soot per gram of snow.
Doherty previously worked with coauthor Stephen Warren, emeritus professor of atmospheric sciences, on a 2006-2010 survey he led of snow in the Arctic. Warren and Doherty also worked with Chinese collaborators in 2010 surveys of snow in northern China, all using the same techniques so the combined results can provide a first-ever global map of snow cleanliness.
Results from China showed rates of pollution tens to hundreds of times greater than in North America, with the highest rate in northeast China of 1,220 nanograms of soot per gram of snow, likely because of industrial activity and other emissions in the Beijing area. But dirt and desert dust also were prevalent in central North China snow.
“For a lot of the central US and north China Great Plains the snow is not very deep. In the US, almost the whole area is agricultural fields and in China there is a lot of animal grazing,” Doherty says. “When the wind blows the dirt gets lofted, maybe just 10 feet off the ground, and gets mixed in with the snow.” North Dakota locals refer to the mixture as “snirt.”
The new paper, published in the journal Science, documents how much light is blocked, and at which wavelengths, by filtered snow samples. A companion paper involves a chemical analysis of the North American samples to pinpoint exactly which compounds are contained in the snow.
“A lot of the focus in climate models has been on black carbon, because it’s a pollutant and it’s very dark,” Doherty says. “But the snow is darkened by other things as well, like organics, and also by dust and soil that can get in the snowpack.”
In fact, they found that in the Great Plains states up to half of light absorption is due to organic matter, or “brown carbon” from burning fossil fuels and from soil that mixes in with falling snow.
The deposits affect both global and local climates. Pollution on the Himalayan glaciers, for instance, is raising concerns that it will speed melt rates and harm water supplies. For US farmers, changes in the snow’s reflectivity could affect when the spring melt will occur and when meltwater will drain out.
Whether the pollution the researchers found in North Dakota is enough to change snow melt timing will have to be answered by region-specific climate models, Doherty says.
“But first the models have to do a more accurate job of representing the amount of dirt that’s in the snowpack.”
The Environmental Protection Agency and the China Scholarship Fund funded the study.
Source: University of Washington