Sexually precocious super flies decoded

UC IRVINE (US) — Researchers have deciphered how lowly fruit flies, bred to rapidly develop and reproduce, actually evolve over time.

The findings, reported in the Sept. 15 online issue of Nature, contradict the long-held belief that sexual beings evolve the same way simpler organisms do.

The discovery could fundamentally alter the direction of genetic research for new pharmaceuticals and other products.

“This is actually decoding the key DNA in the evolution of aging, development, and fertility,” says Michael Rose, professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of California at Irvine.

Rose’s laboratory began breeding the “super flies” used in the current study in 1991—or 600 generations ago.  They “live fast and die young,” he says.

Doctoral student Molly Burke, the study’s lead author, compared the super flies to a control group on a genome-wide basis, the first time such a study of a sexually reproducing species has been done.

The work married DNA “soup” gathered from the adapted flies with cheap, efficient technology that uses cutting-edge informatics tools to analyze the DNA of entire organisms.

Burke found evidence of evolution in more than 500 genes that could be linked to a variety of traits, including size, sexual maturation, and life span, indicating a gradual, widespread network of selective adaptation.

“It’s really exciting,” she says. “This is a new way of identifying genes that are important for traits we’re interested in—as opposed to the old hunting and pecking, looking at one gene at a time.”

For decades, most researchers have assumed that sexual species evolve the same way single-cell bacteria do: A genetic mutation sweeps through a population and quickly becomes “fixated” on a particular portion of DNA.

But the current study shows that when sex is involved, it’s far more complicated.

“This research really upends the dominant paradigm about how species evolve,” says Anthony Long, professor of ecology and evolutionary biology and the study’s primary investigator.

Based on that flawed paradigm, Rose notes, drugs have been developed to treat diabetes, heart disease, and other maladies, some with serious side effects.

He says those side effects probably occur because researchers were targeting single genes, rather than the hundreds of possible gene groups like those Burke found in the flies.

Most people don’t think of flies as close relatives, but previous research had established that humans and other mammals share 70 percent of the same genes as the tiny, banana-eating insect known as Drosophila melanogaster.

Scientists who did not participate in the work agree that it could change the direction of much research.

“Anyone who expects to find a single solution for problems like aging will be disappointed, because this work suggests there’s no one genetic target that could be fixed,” says Richard Lenski, an evolutionary biologist at Michigan State University.

“On the other hand, it means there are many genetic factors that can be further investigated.”

Researchers from the University of Southern California contributed to the study, which was funded by UCI and National Science Foundation grants.

More news from UC Irvine:

chat7 Comments


  1. Roy Niles

    So are these flies exhibiting a self selecting mutation function based on their more recent environmental experiences, or what is the meaning implied by saying, “This research really upends the dominant paradigm about how species evolve.” Why can’t the writers of these articles be more specific, or they afraid to do more than hint that blind natural selection theories may need revising?

  2. Molly Burke

    That natural selection occurred in these populations is an undisputed fact.  What is novel about our investigation is that it suggests that sexually-reproducing species respond to the pressures of natural
    selection in different ways than asexually-reproducing species do, at the molecular level.  Ours is the first study of its kind in a sexually-reproducing species.

  3. Roy Niles

    Then is the difference that it’s not a blind response?

  4. Bebe Brightful

    Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive learn anything like this before. So nice to seek out any individual with some authentic ideas on this subject. realy thanks for starting this up. this website is something that’s wanted on the internet, somebody with a bit of originality. useful job for bringing something new to the internet!

  5. Allie Ward

    Problem with these kind of researches is: if it falls in bad hands, it could generate serious damages.
    I’m thinking about countries like Iran, North Korea…

  6. Martha Hauer

    Thanks for the info, very useful

  7. adobe indesign cheap

    Reading this article – the gift of your time

We respect your privacy.