Science & Technology - Posted by Julie Karceski-Stanford on Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:36 - 6 Comments
Universe’s age: 13.75 billion years

When a large nearby object, such as a galaxy, blocks a distant object, such as another galaxy, the light can detour around the blockage. But instead of taking a single path, light can bend around the object in different routes. As the brightness of the background galaxy nucleus fluctuates, physicists measure light’s ebb and flow from the distinct paths, such as in the B1608+656 system imaged above. (Courtesy: Sherry Suyu/Argelander Institut für Astronomie)
STANFORD (US)—Using entire galaxies as lenses to look at other galaxies, researchers have a newly precise way to measure the size and age of the universe and how rapidly it is expanding, on a par with other techniques.
The measurement determines a value for the Hubble constant, which indicates the size of the universe, and confirms the age of the universe as 13.75 billion years old, within 170 million years. The results also confirm the strength of dark energy, responsible for accelerating the expansion of the universe.
Phil Marshall demonstrates lensing. (Courtesy: Brad Plummer and Julie Karceski)
The results by an international team are published in the Astrophysical Journal. Using data collected by the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, researchers showed the improved precision they provide in combination with the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe.
The team used a technique called gravitational lensing to measure the distances light traveled from a bright, active galaxy to the earth along different paths. By understanding the time it took to travel along each path and the effective speeds involved, researchers could infer not just how far away the galaxy lies but also the overall scale of the universe and some details of its expansion.
It is often difficult for scientists to distinguish between a very bright light far away and a dimmer source lying much closer. A gravitational lens circumvents this problem by providing multiple clues as to the distance light travels. That extra information allows them to determine the size of the universe, often expressed by astrophysicists in terms of a quantity called Hubble’s constant.
“We’ve known for a long time that lensing is capable of making a physical measurement of Hubble’s constant,” says Phil Marshall of the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (KIPAC). However, gravitational lensing had never before been used in such a precise way.
This measurement provides an equally precise measurement of Hubble’s constant as long-established tools such as observation of supernovae and the cosmic microwave background. “Gravitational lensing has come of age as a competitive tool in the astrophysicist’s toolkit,” Marshall says.
When a large nearby object, such as a galaxy, blocks a distant object, such as another galaxy, the light can detour around the blockage. But instead of taking a single path, light can bend around the object in one of two or four different routes, doubling or quadrupling the amount of information scientists receive.
As the brightness of the background galaxy nucleus fluctuates, physicists can measure the ebb and flow of light from the four distinct paths, such as in the B1608+656 system that was the subject of this study. Lead author on the study Sherry Suyu, from the University of Bonn, says: “In our case, there were four copies of the source, which appear as a ring of light around the gravitational lens.”
Though researchers do not know when light left its source, they can still compare arrival times. Marshall likens it to four cars taking four different routes between places on opposite sides of a large city, such as Stanford University to Lick Observatory, through or around San Jose. And like automobiles facing traffic snarls, light can encounter delays, too.
“The traffic density in a big city is like the mass density in a lens galaxy,” Marshall says. “If you take a longer route, it need not lead to a longer delay time. Sometimes the shorter distance is actually slower.”
The gravitational lens equations account for all the variables such as distance and density, and provide a better idea of when light left the background galaxy and how far it traveled.
In the past, this method of distance estimation was plagued by errors, but physicists now believe it is comparable with other measurement methods. With this technique, the researchers have come up with a more accurate lensing-based value for Hubble’s constant, and a better estimation of the uncertainty in that constant. By both reducing and understanding the size of error in calculations, they can achieve better estimations on the structure of the lens and the size of the universe.
There are several factors scientists still need to account for in determining distances with lenses. For example, dust in the lens can skew the results. The Hubble Space Telescope has infra-red filters useful for eliminating dust effects. The images also contain information about the number of galaxies lying around the line of vision; these contribute to the lensing effect at a level that needs to be taken into account.
Marshall says several groups are working on extending this research, both by finding new systems and further examining known lenses. Researchers are already aware of more than twenty other astronomical systems suitable for analysis with gravitational lensing.
This research was supported in part by the Department of Energy Office of Science. Researchers from the University of California, Davis, University of California, Santa Barbara, Argelander Institut für Astronomie and Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik, and Kapteyn Astronomical Institute contributed to the work.
The Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology is a joint institute of Stanford University and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, which is operated by Stanford for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science.
Stanford University news: http://news.stanford.edu/
Please wait
6 Comments
Mike
Edward A Romano
Very interesting!
I have a blog against the expansion of the universe, with arguments that show this is impossible.
How the people consider there are evidences for the Big Bang I study these evidences.
I have arguments and Hypotheses in: http://bigbangno.wordpress.com
Thanks.
WMAP is looking at a cosmic glow far older than anything that the Hubble Space Telescope or Chandra X-ray Observatory can see. It is mapping slight temperature fluctuations within the microwave background that vary by only 0.00001 C across a chilly light that now averages 2.73 C above absolute zero. It is still operating and taking high quality data and the results from the first 2 full years of data which were released in 2004 are testimony to this fact.
It is very interesting. I don’t think words can explain how big and old is the universe. In my opinion it is limited to the individual brain, knowledge and ability to think and imagine about something no one has ever seen and confirmed.
Bob Docking
“researchers have a newly precise way to measure the size and age of the universe and how rapidly it is expanding, on a par with other techniques.”
I have taken this quote from the above and wish to tell you something. You do not know. No one knows.
The researchers, whether they be astronomers, astrophysicists, cosmologists just do not know and they tell everyone that they pretend to know. They all want us to believe them.
Why don’t you just say you do not know and that you would have no idea.
I have also almost finished writing my book on the Big Bang, and I have had to come up with results that could be more exact than you could imagine.
























Interesting!