Science & Technology - Posted by Suzanne Taylor Muzzin-Yale on Tuesday, October 19, 2010 10:25 - 3 Comments    
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

T. rex’s favorite meal? Other T. rex

A T. rex toe bone with teeth marks from another T. rex. The behemoth was the only big carnivore in western North America 65 million years ago that was capable of making such large gouges. (Credit: Nicholas Longrich)

YALE (US) — It turns out that the undisputed king of the dinosaurs, Tyrannosaurus rex, didn’t just eat other dinosaurs. They also ate each other.





Paleontologists have found bite marks on the giants’ bones that were made by other T. rex, according to a new study published online Oct. 15 in the journal PLoS One.

While searching through dinosaur fossil collections for another study on dinosaur bones with mammal tooth marks, researchers discovered a bone with especially large gouges in them.

Given the age and location of the fossil, the marks had to be made by T. rex, says Nick Longrich, postdoctoral associate in the department of geology and geophysics at Yale University.

“They’re the kind of marks that any big carnivore could have made, but T. rex was the only big carnivore in western North America 65 million years ago.”

It was only after discovering the bite marks were from a T. rex that Longrich realized the bone itself also belonged to the behemoth.

After searching through a few dozen T. rex bones from several different museum fossil collections, he discovered a total of three foot bones (including two toes) and one arm bone that showed evidence of T. rex cannibalism, representing a significant percentage.

“It’s surprising how frequent it appears to have been,” Longrich says. “We’re not exactly sure what that means.”

The marks are definitely the result of feeding, although scientists aren’t sure whether they are the result of scavengers or the end result of fighting, Longrich says, adding that if two T. rex fought to the death, the victor might have made a meal out of his adversary.

“Modern big carnivores do this all the time. It’s a convenient way to take out the competition and get a bit of food at the same time.”

However, the marks appear to have been made some time after death, meaning that if one dinosaur killed another, it might have eaten most of the meat off the more accessible parts of the carcass before returning to pick at the smaller foot and arm bones.

While only one other dinosaur species, Majungatholus, is known to have been a cannibal, Longrich says the practice was likely more common than previously thought. Closer examination of fossil bones could turn up more evidence that other species also preyed on one another.

The finding is a big clue into the obscure eating habits of these enormous predators.

While today’s large carnivores often hunt together in packs, T. rex likely acted on their own.

“These animals were some of the largest terrestrial carnivores of all time, and the way they approached eating was fundamentally different from modern species,” Longrich says.

“There’s a big mystery around what and how they ate, and this research helps to uncover one piece of the puzzle.”

Researchers from Montana State University, Florida State University, and the University of Alberta contributed to the study.

More news from Yale University: http://opa.yale.edu/

Please wait

3 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Stuart A. Bair, M.D.
Oct 19, 2010 12:42

It is my understanding that Rex’s protected their eggs in a nest. Might these findings simply represent maternal or paternal protectiveness with the obvious side benefit of a god meal?

Cable
Oct 20, 2010 17:28

@Bair – Your suggestion that the adult T-Rex would only cannibalize to defend its young implies that the T-Rex parent needed to defend their young from other adult T-Rexes. Cannibalism to defend against cannibalism would not explain away the original motive for cannibalism. It is more likely that cannibalism had a variety of motivations. There are many good motives for one T-Rex to kill another. Eating the remains seems like the sensible thing to do for such a large species with such high dietary demands. It seems so sensible that I have to wonder when and why our species stopped considering each other as potential food.

Dr. O'
Oct 21, 2010 17:38

Another question. Was this a case of instant gratification or was it necessary for the dead T.Rex to ripen to taste? If T.Rex was primarily a scavanger fresh meat might not have been to his taste and the reason the tooth marks seem to have been on older specimens was because the winner (or eater) waited a few days.

Leave a Comment

Comment

Research news from leading universities

Daily E-News


Browse By School

Follow Futurity

RSS feedsFacebookTwitter

Media Partners

Alltop logo Pulse logo Flipboard logo Visual News logo The Conversation logo

Week's Most Discussed

  • Loading...