Comments on: Surfer’s ‘everything theory’ wipes out

By: Resan

Resan — Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:06:34 +0000

continue with the the good work on the blog. I appreciate it. Could maybe use some more updates more often, but i’m quite sure that you have got better things to do , hehe. ;)

By: Pamela Miles

Pamela Miles — Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:16:59 +0000

When I was single and people asked me what I was looking for in a relationship I would say ” I want to be as happy (grateful) to have met him as he is to have met me.”

When you realize everything you have, you’ve been given, you are in touch with true love.

By: CHARLES DARWIN

CHARLES DARWIN — Sat, 01 Jan 2011 01:14:44 +0000

true/ false

real/fake

yes/no

real/hoax.

right/wrong

“if a theory disagrees with Experiment, then it is wrong” the late great Richard Feynman… “the one simple sentence captures the “essence of science”

theory/ experiment… experiment/ theory…

wishful thinking. fantasy …. fantasy in the UNIVERSITY does Not make it true?

true / false. real/fake real/hoax.. yes/no. this one is Fake…

By: yiran

yiran — Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:24:12 +0000

rock climber and mathematics may be a good combination. on other hand how much frontal lobe are the rock climber uses, since monkey may as well climb a tall mountain.

By: Mirza

Mirza — Thu, 30 Dec 2010 22:59:39 +0000

The E8 is a Lie!

By: Michael Shingleton

Michael Shingleton — Thu, 30 Dec 2010 18:56:17 +0000

Whether or not the “everything” theory is true, you can experience it by simply putting all your attention and intention on the sound of your breath. All sound disappears or dies into stillness. The subtle sound of the breath likewise fades out into a space where the in-breath ends and before the out-breath begins and vice versa. In this space is an experience of everything.

By: Joel

Joel — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:31:39 +0000

@ Nathan Solo – 256 is the maximum human life span in what unit of measure? And the minimum number of colors on a computer monitor would be one (I’m old enough to have owned an amber and a green monochrome monitor). 256 generations from Adam and Eve – which generation are you referencing? Just curious, not hating.

By: Nathan Solo

Nathan Solo — Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:20:15 +0000

The only thing wrong with the theory is that the geometric construct should be 256, not 248. 256 is the number of times a human cell will replace itself, the maximum human lifespan, the minimum number of colors on a computer monitor, the number of generations since Adam and Eve, 8 cell divisions of mitosis, I could go on and on, but you get the idea. 256 is the magic number of the bible, not 248. Nathan Solo, prodigious savant.

By: curlycue

curlycue — Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:37:24 +0000

everything is subjective; math receives no exemptions

By: James

James — Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:08:35 +0000

Unfortunately, the tone of Distler and Garibaldi’s paper is that of jealousy.
Perhaps, their critical comments will be useful.

Lisi deserves a lot of credit for putting forth an interesting theory. He acknowledges
that the theory needs to address the rest of the physics issues and that takes time
and a lot of work.

Whether LIsi’s work ends up being the correct path to a GUT or not, it is certainly meritorious.