Science & Technology - Posted by Steve McGaughey-Illinois on Friday, February 5, 2010 16:49 - 4 Comments    
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Seeing the world in waves of consciousness

Tahiti Wave

“There is this idea that we look out into the world and see this ongoing flow of consciousness that has been compared to a stream,” says the paper’s lead author, Kyle Mathewson. “This evidence and other evidence are starting to show it might not be like that, it might be more discrete.” That is, “the brain can synchronize its waves of consciousness to predictable rhythmic events,” says coauthor Diane Beck.

U. ILLINOIS (US)—The term “stream of consciousness”—used both in the literary world and by psychologists to describe  the way our conscious minds interpret the world—may not accurately depict the way visual systems in our brains function.





A study published by University of Illinois researchers in 2009 reveals the discovery of a pulsed inhibition mechanism in the brain that explained how the visual system often fails to perceive normally detectable visual stimuli from the environment because the brain samples the visual environment in rhythmic “frames” rather than continuously.

Now a second paper in this research line is reporting that these rhythmic frames can be entrained to external signals and induce an increase in visual sensitivity at the precise moment in time in which a visual event is expected to happen.

The results of experimental findings from this most recent study, the researchers write, “suggest a plausible mechanism of temporal attention.” That is, “the brain can synchronize its waves of consciousness to predictable rhythmic events,” says Diane Beck, a coauthor of the paper.

“There is this idea that we look out into the world and see this ongoing flow of consciousness that has been compared to a stream,” says Kyle Mathewson, lead author of the paper that appears in the journal Cognition. “This evidence and other evidence are starting to show it might not be like that, it might be more discrete.”

This latest study shows that the effect the researchers observed can be controlled through entraining the brain. The authors write: “This entrainment may represent a mechanism by which temporal attention is tuned to produce temporally-precise peaks in visual sensitivity, to both anticipate and optimize visual processing of brief visual events. Rhythmic visual entrainment has a dramatic effect on visual sensitivity, providing us with a powerful technique to experimentally control with fine temporal precision whether or not near-threshold stimuli reach conscious awareness.”

Mathewson says this is the first time that research has demonstrated that these brain rhythms can be controlled and harnessed in this way. “These results are the first evidence that you can actually entrain the brain rhythms of the visual system that we measured in the past experiment so that you can have control over visibility of stimuli.

“In our previous paper we found that, depending on what state of this ongoing phase the brain is in, you will be more or less likely to see a target or it will escape your awareness. Now we are able to actually control the really precise timing of those events. It’s almost like we can set up a filter through which people can look at the world that has a timing aspect to it.”

The experiment employed a faint, rhythmic light stimulus and the technique of backward masking, which involves a second visual stimulus that masks the stimulus that preceded it so that the second stimulus is the one that reaches the conscious mind and the first is at near-threshold levels of being seen, causing its visual information to be lost.

The researchers report that the results show how “consciousness of otherwise masked stimuli can be experimentally induced by sensory entrainment” and that the data reveals how “awareness of near-threshold stimuli can be manipulated by entrainment to rhythmic events, supporting the functional role of induced oscillations in underlying cortical excitability, and suggest a plausible mechanism of temporal attention.”

“The entrainment allows the brain to be more sensitive at a particular moment in time—the time where it is expecting the world to show something,” says coauthor Alejandro Lleras. “If you present the stimulation at that particular point in time then we are able to increase the sensitivity of the brain to outside stimulation. Now you will be able to see things that otherwise would be much less likely to register in your brain.”

Lleras says the effect seen in this study are something new. “For a long time this has been portrayed as random fluctuations in the brain, neural noise and things like that,” he adds. “Things we can never get a handle on, stochastic processes in the brain. But now we seem to be starting to get a handle on that issue and discovering ways in which we can get better at saying whether you will in fact see that little light and increasing your chances of seeing that light. The magnitude of our effect is pretty large.”

University of Illinois news: www.beckman.illinois.edu/

Please wait

4 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Visual perception in waves
Feb 5, 2010 18:32

[...] research is relevant to our project.  The breathing patterns of the lungs could influence what gets [...]

mary dreyer
Feb 6, 2010 10:33

Does this work with auditory stimuli too? So visual perceptionis like digital sampling? Does this relate to the rate of say, frames/sec in a movie or the, not sure of the term, but replacement rate of a video picture? How about how people vary in their sensitivity to fluorescent lights’ flickering? How about the visual self-stimulation that some autistic or low-functioning kids show– generating flicker with their fingers or hands (I don’t mean ‘overflow’ flapping). And in a sci-fi vein, there could be distinct worlds, presented at different intervals. I.e., +_+_+_+_+_+_ you could be tuned into the + world or the – world, and so have a completely different experience than someone in the same space. Clearly, the real world doesn’t have these conditions, so even if we are not tuned the same, we see more or less the same thing… what is going on when attention is ‘off’? Aren’t attention and the meaning-making aspects of perception different systems? What if many systems in the brain work this way; do they have to be in sync? And if they aren’t, what then? Or just a little out of tune? This is very interesting!

emc2
Feb 8, 2010 12:36

Perhaps this is why, when I lose something, my husband can find it by going and looking everywhere I have already looked.

Mary Dreyer
Aug 28, 2011 14:02

I remember a study I read long ago about rhythmic auditory stimuli– that ( I guess within a certain range near 1per second) could speed or slow heartbeat to match the rhythm.

Leave a Comment

Comment

Research news from leading universities

Daily E-News


Browse By School

Follow Futurity

RSS feedsFacebookTwitter

Week's Most Discussed

  • Loading...

Media Partners

Alltop logo Pulse logo Flipboard logo Visual News logo The Conversation logo