Science & Technology - Posted by Lisa De Nike-JHU on Thursday, September 20, 2012 6:42 - 8 Comments    
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Most distant galaxy shines light on early universe

At left, the many galaxies of a massive cluster called MACS J1149+2223 dominate the view from NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope. Gravitational lensing by the giant cluster brightened by some 15 times the light from the newfound galaxy, known as MACS 1149-JD. At upper right, a partial zoom-in shows MACS 1149-JD in more detail; a deeper zoom appears to the lower right. (Credit: NASA/ESA/STScI/JHU)

JOHNS HOPKINS (US) — Astronomers have spotted what could be the most distant galaxy ever seen.


Light from the young galaxy—captured by NASA’s orbiting Spitzer and Hubble space telescopes—started its sojourn toward Earth when the now-13.7-billion-year-old universe was just 500 million years old.

The far-off galaxy is seen as it existed during an important period, when the universe began to transit out of its so-called “Dark Ages.” During this period, the universe went from a dark, starless expanse to a recognizable cosmos full of galaxies.

Straight from the Source

Read the original study

DOI: 10.1038/nature11446

The discovery of the faint, small galaxy opens up a window into the deepest, remotest epochs of cosmic history.

“This galaxy is the most distant object we have ever observed with high confidence,” says Wei Zheng, a principal research scientist in physics and astronomy at the Johns Hopkins University and lead author of a paper appearing in Nature on Sept. 20.

“Future work involving this galaxy—as well as others like it that we hope to find—will allow us to study the universe’s earliest objects and how the Dark Ages ended,” adds Zheng.

Five wavebands

Light from the primordial galaxy traveled approximately 13.2 billion light-years before reaching NASA’s telescopes. In other words, the starlight snagged by Spitzer and Hubble left the galaxy when the universe was just 3.6 percent of its present age.

Unlike previous detections of possible galaxies in this age range, which were only glimpsed in a single color, or waveband, this newfound galaxy has been seen in five different wavebands.

As part of the Cluster Lensing and Supernova Survey with Hubble program, the Hubble Space Telescope registered it in four wavelength bands. Spitzer located it in a fifth band with its Infrared Array Camera.

Objects at these extreme distances are mostly beyond the detection sensitivity of today’s largest telescopes. To catch sight of such early, distant galaxies, astronomers rely on “gravitational lensing.”

The gravity of foreground objects warps and magnifies the light from background objects as that light passes by en route to Earth. A massive galaxy cluster situated between our galaxy and the early galaxy magnified the latter’s light, brightening the remote object some 15 times and bringing it into view.

Based on the Spitzer and Hubble observations, astronomers think the distant galaxy was spied at a time when it was less than 200 million years old. It also is small and compact, containing only about 1 percent of our Milky Way’s mass.

According to leading cosmological theories, the first galaxies should indeed have started out tiny. They then progressively merged, eventually growing into the sizable galaxies of the more modern universe.

End of the Dark Ages

These first galaxies likely played the dominant role in the epoch of reionization, the event that signaled the demise of the Dark Ages.

About 400,000 years after the Big Bang, neutral hydrogen gas formed from cooling particles. The first luminous stars and their host galaxies, however, did not emerge until a few hundred million years later.

The energy released by these earliest galaxies is thought to have caused the neutral hydrogen strewn throughout the universe to ionize, or lose an electron, the state in which the gas has remained since that time.

“In essence, during the epoch of reionization, the lights came on in the universe,” says co-author Leonidas Moustakas, a research scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, a division of the California Institute of Technology.

Astronomers plan to study the rise of the first stars and galaxies and the epoch of reionization with the successor to both Spitzer and Hubble—NASA’s James Webb Telescope, slated for launch in 2018. The newly described distant galaxy will likely be a prime target.

Holland Ford, one of Zheng’s Johns Hopkins colleagues and a co-author on the paper, says that the first few hundred million years after the birth of the universe is an exciting frontier of scientific knowledge.

With Zheng’s discovery, “we are seeing a galaxy when it was not even a toddler,” Ford says. “But this infant galaxy will in its future grow to be a galaxy like our own, hopefully hosting planetary systems with astronomers who will look back in time and see our galaxy in its infancy.”

The study in Nature is accompanied by a commentary written by astronomer Daniel Stark of the University of Arizona.

Source: Johns Hopkins University

Please wait

8 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Naveen
Oct 6, 2012 11:46

Did the Big Bang occur at a single point ?

The light is said to have left this galaxy some 500 million years after the big bang – fine.
The galaxy therefore must have been no further than 500 million light years from the point of the big bang since it could not have traveled faster than the speed of light (according to the theory of relativity).

Assuming that the galaxy moved in a direction diametrically opposite to the direction that “we” moved after the big bang, “we” would be 13.2-0.5=12.7 billion light years from the point where Big Bang occurred (assuming that it did indeed occur at a single point).

Now, since the Big Bang occurred 13.7 billion years ago & happened at a point 12.7 billion light years away, “we” would have to have traveled a minimum of 12.7 billion light years in “our” 13.7 billion year existence.

“Our” average speed for this “flight” would have to be some 93% of the speed of light !!!!

So, is it really true that “we” have been traveling at an average speed of 93% of the speed of light since the Big Bang ?
Or is there some other explanation for this anomaly ?

Lew Fisher
Oct 16, 2012 14:32

Ditto to to Naveen’s comments above. Light which has travelled 13.2 billion light years prior to reaching our lens does just not compute logically for me. Naveen has described the apparent paradox well in the discourse above.

Problem?
Oct 16, 2012 23:43

Speed is relative. What is the paradox?

Naveen
Oct 17, 2012 0:28

Problem?,

“Speed is relative” – Can you explain this further ?
Relative to the point of the Big bang, to get this far from it (i.e. 12.7 billion light years away), our speed would have to be about 93% of the speed of light – this is improbable. What’s the explanation ?

Redman
Oct 17, 2012 12:42

According to inflation theory, during the first second, the universe expanded at speeds such that two points would recede from each other at speeds well in excess of the speed of light. This was before any particles formed, so no object was traveling faster than c.
This theory is necessary to explain the “horizon problem”, the uniformity of the cosmic background radiation. As a result, the universe has a radius greater than its age in light years.
Just read this in “The Hidden Reality” by the theoretical physicist Brian Greene. Assuming space is flat, the radius of the observable universe is thought to be in the 40B ly range. (Greene, p. 28) This object would be right around that distance.

Naveen
Oct 17, 2012 23:59

Thanks, Redman – appreciate the source.

cectGrare
Oct 29, 2012 9:21

StcaPOKS [url=http://canadagoosejacketsuomi.info/]Canada Goose Trillium Parka[/url]
gjlrDMNvg http://monclerschweizonlineshop.info/
ubxwhcnylx [url=http://jordanscarpeitalia.info/#2624]Air Jordan Shop[/url]
GXQqUyxbj kfkjsh [url=http://canadagoosereajacka.info/]Canada Goose Väst[/url]
CfqKSBWHifz QxgtALFO [url=http://canadagooseonlineshopnederland.info/]Canada Goose Online Shop[/url]
fdlvDWKgl BknmBFPF http://jordanshopuk.info/
cgjyMDZyf

Marlena Heidenreich
Nov 12, 2012 22:21

98% of astronomical guesswork, and 99% of accepted astronomical “knowledge” is inaccurate; But even in the error is much interesting information; Earthlings understand very little about everything, even in that is complete incompletion;

Humility is understanding their are intelligent beings who do have perfect understanding, and one with complete understanding, and One who is understanding;

Just saying….

Keep working on it, or be patient and try a different basis of understanding; Such as humility, love and mercy;

Leave a Comment

Comment

Research news from leading universities

Daily E-News


Follow Futurity

RSS feedsFacebookTwitter

Week's Most Discussed

  • Loading...

Media Partners

Alltop logo EarthSky logo Pulse logo Flipboard logo The Conversation logo

Browse By School