Share this article

 Email

 Print

 

Republish this article

The text of this article by Futurity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License.

More
Science & Technology

Permafrost microbe loves salty Arctic ‘veins’

So, it’s not parasitic mind control?

First boson laser could save power

This quick visual test predicts IQ

Citizen scientists tag bug collections online

‘Dynamo’ accounts for Sun’s weather cycle

Violent weather on Neptune, Uranus doesn’t run deep

Do bird brains trade songs for spatial skills?

Bendy nano-sensors detect infrared light

Cooperation is surprisingly common among wild animals, researchers say. While it makes evolutionary sense for animals to help their kin, it is harder to explain cases where competitors—especially unrelated adult males—join forces. This conundrum is particularly hard to explain because mating is generally a zero-sum game in which males can only reproduce by stealing mating opportunities from each other.

Why would an alpha male allow other males to be a part of his unit if they will inevitably decrease the probability that he will pass on his own genes? Researchers felt there must be a reason since this kind of behavior is observed in many species.

A follower male sits with an offspring that he may have sired. (Credit: Noah Snyder-Mackler)

“For example, in some species unrelated males will sometimes tolerate the presence of one another and, in rare cases, form bonds and even appear to cooperate,” says Noah Snyder-Mackler, a graduate student in psychology at the University of Pennsylvania at the time of the study and now a postdoctoral fellow at Duke University.

To understand why potential rivals might team up, researchers compared the fitness consequences for dominant male gelada monkeys living in single- or multi-male groups. They found that, although subordinate males father some of the offspring in multi-male groups, dominant males gain a lifetime fitness benefit because the subordinate aids in defense of the group from other males, thus extending the dominant male’s reproductive career.

Reported in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B, the findings are based on data collected during a five-year period through the University of Michigan Gelada Research Project.

Payment for services

Even more tantalizing is evidence that the subordinate males that are allowed to mate stay around in the group for much longer.

“This suggests that the alpha males may allow the subordinate to reproduce as a ‘staying incentive’ for defending the group, a payment for their services,” says co-author Thor Bergman, assistant professor of psychology at the University of Michigan.

While it is not yet clear that a willing exchange is occurring—subordinate males may simply steal some chances at reproduction—the evidence is strong that subordinates confer some benefit to the leader.

“These findings demonstrate a benefit of forming multi-male groups in a predominantly single-male system, an important step in the evolution of sociality among unrelated competitors,” Bergman says.

In studying wild geladas in the Simien Mountains National Park in Ethiopia, researchers identified the leader and follower males, noted the numbers of females in all units; tracked individuals involved in unit takeovers; and noted all new births. They used non-invasively collected genetic samples to conduct paternity analysis to determine the identities of the fathers.

Researchers saw that the dominant and subordinate males cooperatively defended their females by fending off unattached bachelor males intent on taking their females, the likely mechanism leading to the increased tenure of the dominants.

Even though geladas primarily form single-male groups, researchers showed a benefit to forming multi-male groups. Multi-male units had fewer takeovers (a rate of 0.27) per year from other competitors and longer tenure (3.7 years as leader) compared with single-male units (0.35 takeovers per year and 2.86 years as leader.)

“Overall, this means that, just because animals appear to be in direct competition for a limited resource, they may still benefit from the relationship overall,” Snyder-Mackler says.

Thus, cooperation can evolve among competitors through a variety of mechanisms. In the study, researchers chronicled how it can evolve in the context of reproductive sharing.

“More comparative research on other species will give us a better understanding of how and under what circumstances cooperation among unrelated individuals may have evolved,” Snyder-Mackler says.

Susan Alberts, professor of biology at Duke University, also contributed to the research that was funded by the National Science Foundation, Leakey Foundation and National Geographic Society.

More news from University of Pennsylvania news: http://www.upenn.edu/pennnews/