Science & Technology - Posted by John Carberry-Cornell on Thursday, June 21, 2012 11:14 - 2 Comments
Bird’s wing is built for love, not flight

The male club-winged manakin has large, dense bones that adapted for courtship—an extreme example of a species modifying a body part to attract a mate, but with a presumed cost to its fitness. (Credit: Francesco Veronesi/Flickr)
CORNELL (US) — A small bird found in the forests of Ecuador and Colombia has a very rare wing structure that allows the males to make sounds to woo mates.
Researchers first reported in 2005 on the ability of male club-winged manakin to rub specialized wing feathers together to produce a high hum. Now they report in the journal Biology Letters that they are the first flying birds to have solid wing bones.
In the male club-winged manakin, the ulna (analogous to a human bone in the forearm) is ridged, solid instead of hollow, and 3.5 times the volume of other similar-sized birds’ ulnae, including other manakin species.
Special sound-producing feathers attached to the ulna resonate to make the courtship tones. The researchers also found similar but lesser adaptations to the humerus, which is the same as the bone between elbow and shoulder in humans.
The researchers believe the large, dense bones are adapted for courtship and come at a cost to efficient flight where lighter, hollow bones are ideal. The adaptations offer an extreme example of a species modifying a body part to attract a mate, but with a presumed cost to its fitness.
“The idea that there’s this conflict between sexual selection and natural selection is not new,” says Kim Bostwick, curator of the Cornell University Museum of Vertebrates and lead author of the study.
For example, a male peacock’s large, showy feathers also inhibit flight but work well to attract females. With the club-winged manakin, the adaptation “isn’t just the feathers and what they look like. This is a functional change at the deepest levels. Ultimately, it’s the female that’s responsible for this odd bone inside the wing of the male.”
The researchers used microcomputer tomography (CT) scanners to noninvasively obtain complete density data of the inside of the bird bones, which could then be reconstructed into 3-D color images.
In 2003, Bostwick had the only club-winged manakin specimens in the world, but too few to dissect down to the bones, though she suspected the bones were novel. Julian Humphreys, a co-author on the paper and a researcher with a National Science Foundation digital library at the University of Texas at Austin, suggested that Bostwick try the manakin specimens in their CT scanner.
“He sent me back this image and said, ‘Oh my gosh, can you believe what you are seeing?’” Bostwick says. “That’s when we realized we had an amazing and totally unique structure.”
For this study, Bostwick and co-author Mark Riccio, director of the Cornell Multiscale CT Facility, took and analyzed images. They compared a club-winged manakin’s bones with the wing bones of seven other manakin species.
The CT scanner allowed them to image all the different birds’ bones at once, so the readings for each bone were equally calibrated for comparisons and quantification. Since a few other manakins also make wing sounds, Bostwick wanted to see if the evolutionary origins of the club-winged manakins’ adaptation were evident in the other birds.
“The big picture is the club-winged manakin is out on its own with a totally different wing,” Bostwick says. “Some of these species do show some of the patterns but they’re in a different end of the continuum.”
The study was funded by the National Science Foundation.
More news from Cornell University: www.news.cornell.edu
Please wait
2 Comments
Jerry
You have made a great point here
























Fantastic article–something I’ve come to expect from futurity.org! I just have one issue, and it comes with this sentence: “The adaptations offer an extreme example of a species modifying a body part to attract a mate, but with a presumed cost to its fitness.”
From what I understand, fitness in a biological sense refers to the number of an organism’s fertile offspring–how many copies of its genes reach the next generation. If this is still the accepted definition, there is no “presumed cost to its fitness,” because the females of the species are attracted to males with this trait, meaning more offspring, meaning greater fitness–or else the adaptation wouldn’t have caught on.
Other than that–what a brilliant find, and I wouldn’t have heard about it without this article. Thank you!