Totally RAD

Rewritable digital data stored in live DNA

STANFORD (US) — Bioengineers have developed a way to repeatedly encode, store, and erase digital data within the DNA of living cells.

“It took us three years and 750 tries to make it work, but we finally did it,” says Jerome Bonnet, a postdoctoral scholar at Stanford University, who worked with graduate student Pakpoom Subsoontorn and assistant professor Drew Endy to reapply natural enzymes adapted from bacteria to flip specific sequences of DNA back and forth at will.

In practical terms, they have devised the genetic equivalent of a binary digit—a “bit” in data parlance. “Essentially, if the DNA section points in one direction, it’s a zero. If it points the other way, it’s a one,” Subsoontorn explains.


Pakpoom Subsoontorn (left) and Jerome Bonnet show off a petri dish with two arrows formed of cells modified using their Recombinase Addressable Data (RAD) storage device. (Credit: Norbert von der Groeben)

“Programmable data storage within the DNA of living cells would seem an incredibly powerful tool for studying cancer, aging, organismal development, and even the natural environment,” says Endy.

Researchers could count how many times a cell divides, for instance, and that might someday give scientists the ability to turn off cells before they turn cancerous.

In the computer world, their work would form the basis of what is known as non-volatile memory—data storage that can retain information without consuming power. In biotechnology, it is known by a slightly more technical term, recombinase-mediated DNA inversion, after the enzymatic processes used to cut, flip, and recombine DNA within the cell.

Totally RAD

The team calls its device a “recombinase addressable data” module, or RAD for short. They used RAD to modify a particular section of DNA with microbes that determines how the one-celled organisms will fluoresce under ultraviolet light.

The microbes glow red or green depending upon the orientation of the section of DNA. Using RAD, the engineers can flip the section back and forth at will.

They reported their findings in a paper published online May 21 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Bonnet is the first author of the paper, and Endy is the senior author.

Under ultraviolet light, petri dishes containing cells glow red or green depending upon the orientation of a specific section of genetic code inside the cells’ DNA. The section of DNA can be flipped back and forth using the RAD technique.

To make their system work, the team had to control the precise dynamics of two opposing proteins, integrase and excisionase, within the microbes.

“Previous work had shown how to flip the genetic sequence—albeit irreversibly—in one direction through the expression of a single enzyme,” Bonnet says, “but we needed to reliably flip the sequence back and forth, over and over, in order to create a fully reusable binary data register, so we needed something different.”

“The problem is that the proteins do their own thing. If both are active at the same time, or concentrated in the wrong amounts, you get a mess and the individual cells produce random results,” Subsoontorn adds.

The researchers found it was fairly easy to flip a section of DNA in either direction. “But we discovered time and again that most of our designs failed when the two proteins were used together within the same cell,” says Endy. “Ergo: Three years and 750 tries to get the balance of protein levels right.”

From bit to byte

Bonnet has now tested RAD modules in single microbes that have doubled more than 100 times and the switch has held. He has likewise switched the latch and watched a cell double 90 times, and set it back. The latch will even store information when the enzymes are not present. In short, RAD works. It is reliable and it is rewritable.

For Endy and the team, the future of computing then becomes not only how fast or how much can be computed, but when and where computations occur and how those computations might impact our understanding of and interaction with life.

“One of the coolest places for computing,” Endy says, “is within biological systems.”
His goal is to go from the single bit he has now to eight bits—or a “byte”—of programmable genetic data storage.

“I’m not even really concerned with the ways genetic data storage might be useful down the road, only in creating scalable and reliable biological bits as soon as possible. Then we’ll put them in the hands of other scientists to show the world how they might be used,” Endy says.

To get there, however, science will need many new tools for engineering biology, he adds, but it will not be easy. “Such systems will likely be 10 to 50 times more complicated than current state-of-the-art genetic engineering projects,” he notes.

For what it is worth, Endy anticipates their second bit of rewritable DNA data will arrive faster than the first and the third faster still, but it will take time.

“We’re probably looking at a decade from when we started to get to a full byte,” he says. “But, by focusing today on tools that improve the engineering cycle at the heart of biotechnology, we’ll help make all future engineering of biology easier, and that will lead us to much more interesting places.”

The research was funded by the National Science Foundation’s Synthetic Biology Engineering Research Center, and by fellowship grants from Stanford’s Center for Longevity and its Bio-X program.

More news from Stanford University: http://news.stanford.edu/

chat5 Comments

You are free to share this article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported license.

5 Comments

  1. potheadjordan420

    i bet they can take plant Dna of Cannabis and make it so it producs more thc with this technology

  2. anonymouscommenter

    They probably will clone people and animals with DNA that can be controlled like robots.

  3. John Todd

    This article is notably vague on the input to the process. “re-writable” implies some external, non-destructive method of changing the bit orientation. Injecting a new DNA sequence into the critter seems to be not really re-writable. Is exposure to a certain chemical the trigger that sets bit orientation? Is this inheritable through generations? Not enough to go on here, so the authors of this article need to be more specific in their investigation and re-statement of the discovery set.

  4. Andrew Myers

    John: There is no new section being inserted. The two enzymes act upon a known section of existing DNA, and the researchers can control which direction that section of DNA is oriented. If it points one direction it represent a “0” in digital terms, if the other “1”. THe advancement is in the balance of the enzymes that control the direction of the section of DNA.

  5. Chris

    I’m curious if the ultraviolet light would interact with the DNA within the microbes/bacteria to mutate it in some way? Has this been considered by the authors of the PNAS paper? I did download the paper, but have not yet read it. Also, what is meant by ”more interesting places” in the statement by Endy–”But, by focusing today on tools that improve the engineering cycle at the heart of biotechnology, we’ll help make all future engineering of biology easier, and that will lead us to much more interesting places.””?

We respect your privacy.