At some of Europe's most important scientific meetings in 2011, women were underrepresented because men accepted invitations more often. Now researchers want to know why. (Credit: iStockphoto)

equality

Research by female scientists gets less exposure

It’s not clear why high quality scientific work by female academics goes underrepresented in comparison to that of their male counterparts, experts say.

Researchers analyzed the genders of invited speakers at the most prestigious gatherings of evolutionary biologists in Europe—six biannual congresses of the European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB) and found that male speakers outnumbered women.

Even in comparison to the numbers of women and men among world class scientists—from the world top ranked institutions for life sciences, and authors in the top-tier journals Nature and Science—women were still underrepresented among invited speakers.

The researchers, whose study appears in the Journal of Evolutionary Biology, also found that women were underrepresented at the 2011 congress because men accepted invitations more often than women.

Pregnancy and childcare

Hannah Dugdale from the Department of Animal and Plant Sciences at the University of Sheffield, explains that “it’s important that we understand why this is happening and what we can do to address it—high quality science by women has low exposure at international level and this is constraining evolutionary biology from reaching its full potential.

“We’re currently investigating the reasons behind this lower acceptance rate—it could relate to childcare requirements, lower perception of scientific ability, being uncomfortable with self-promotion—there are many potential contributing factors.”

Julia Schroeder, a scientist at the Max Planck Institute for Ornithology in Germany says: “The most demanding phase of a career in biology, when it is important to communicate one’s findings, and to build networks with other scientists, coincides with the age at which women’s fertility starts to decline, meaning it is their last chance to have a family unlike men.

[related]

“Thus, women scientists of this career phase may be pregnant, or have children. Stay-at-home-dads are rare, therefore, these women are less flexible about travelling for work, and may be more likely to decline invitations to speak. We have yet to investigate whether this is indeed the cause, but it is a likely factor that starts the downward spiral: lower exposure and fewer networking opportunities are costly to the career. Fewer women in top positions mean fewer female role models for students who aspire to be scientists.”

“Taking action to foster a culture that supports equality and diversity within research and that encourages better representation and support for women at all stages of their career is extremely important,” says Kirsty Grainger, head of Skills and Careers at the Natural Environment Research Council.

“We need to ensure that we attract and retain the brightest and best researchers, regardless of their background, into the UK research base. Understanding and addressing disincentives and indirect obstacles to recruitment, retention, and progression in research careers is an essential part of this.”

The Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), the Volkswagen Foundation, and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research funded the study.

Source: University of Sheffield

Related Articles