Remote islands maintain unique species
U. LEEDS (US) — If animal and bird species found exclusively on a single island are not in common within that island, human activity is probably to blame.
The theory applies to both actual islands and isolated areas of habitat on the mainland that are home to unique species, such as the table top mountains of South America.
The natural history of islands is littered with examples of unusual species found only in one place, such as the Hawaiian Goose, Galápagos Tortoises and Dodo that may once have been common on their islands, but since human contact have become rare or even extinct.
“Models of island ecology have tended to focus on the total number of different species that you might expect to find on an island, rather than on how common or rare those species are and whether or not they are unique to the island,” says James Rosindell, of the University of Leeds.
“Our model is able to predict the way that new species develop in isolation from the mainland as well as how many individuals of each species we could expect to see in their natural habitat. However, there is little data on population sizes and this highlights a real gap in knowledge that we need to fill.”
Researchers collated data on bird species found across 35 islands and archipelagos. Modern genetics makes it possible to identify which species have diverged to create new species—so the team was able to test their model against actual data.
The model and data both show that while islands close to the mainland have no unique species, more distant islands tend to have unique species that are closely related to mainland species.
Only the islands and archipelagos furthest from the mainland are expected to contain large numbers of unique species closely related to each other, such as Darwin’s finches on the Galápagos and the Hawaiian honeycreepers.
“This model is still in its early stages of development, but we hope it will help to prompt more study of population sizes on islands,” says Albert Phillimore of Imperial College London.
“Comparing the predictions of different models to actual data can help us to identify where other factors are coming into play—such as additional ecological processes and human intervention.
In the future, we plan to look at how the model could also help make predictions relevant to conservation strategy.”
The work has been funded through an EPSRC research fellowship and an Imperial Junior Research Fellowship.
More news from University of Leeds: www.leeds.ac.uk/news
You are free to share this article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported license.