prosthetic_arm_1

Paralyzed man’s mind moves prosthetic arm

U. PITTSBURGH (US) — Seven years after a motorcycle accident damaged his spinal cord and left him paralyzed, 30-year-old Tim Hemmes reached up to touch hands with his girlfriend in a painstaking and tender high-five.

Hemmes is the first to participate in a new trial assessing whether the thoughts of a person with spinal cord injury can be used to control the movement of an external device, such as a computer cursor or a sophisticated prosthetic arm.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yff20TlHv34

The project, one of two brain-computer interface (BCI) studies under way at the University of Pittsburgh, used a grid of electrodes placed on the surface of the brain to control the arm.

It was a unique robotic arm and hand, designed by the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, that Hemmes willed to extend first toward the palm of a researcher on the team and, a few minutes later, to his girlfriend’s hand.

“I put my heart and soul into everything they asked me to do,” he said immediately after his achievement. “I got to reach out and touch somebody for the first time in seven years.”

“Seeing Tim reach out with a mechanical arm to touch his girlfriend was an unexpected and poignant bonus for all of us who are involved with this exciting project,” says co-principal investigator Michael Boninger, M.D., director of the UPMC Rehabilitation Institute.

“This first round of testing reinforces the great potential BCI technology holds for not only helping spinal cord-injured patients become more independent, but also enhancing their physical and emotional connections with their friends and family,” adds Boninger, who also is professor and chair of the physical medicine and rehabilitation department. “It further motivates us to make this technology useful and available to those who need it.”

Grid of electrodes

On Aug. 25, an electrocortigraphy (ECoG) grid, about the size of a large postage stamp, adapted from seizure-mapping brain electrode arrays, was placed on the surface of Hemmes’ brain during a two-hour operation performed by co-investigator and UPMC neurosurgeon Elizabeth Tyler-Kabara, assistant professor of neurological surgery.

“Before the procedure, we conducted several functional imaging tests to determine where his brain processed signals for moving his right arm,” she says. “We removed a small piece of his skull and opened the thick layer of protective dura mater beneath it to place the grid over that area of motor cortex. We then put the dura and skull back with the wires on the outside of the skull but under the scalp.”

Tyler-Kabara tunneled the connecting wires under the neck skin to exit from the upper chest, where they could be periodically hooked up to computer cables. Six days per week for the next four weeks at home and on campus, Hemmes and the team tested the technology.

The researchers used computer software they developed in earlier studies to interpret the neural signals sensed by the brain grid.

‘100 percent brain control’

After watching a computer-generated figure move an arm, Hemmes began trying to guide a ball from the middle of a large television screen either up, down, left or right to a target, within a time limit. With practice, he could do this two-dimensional task without any computer assistance or what the researchers call “100 percent brain control.”

He then performed a similar task with the arm, reaching out to touch a target on a large, desk-mounted panel.

It wasn’t the simultaneous thought-and-move process that he knew before becoming paralyzed. Instead, he imagined flexing his thumb, which created a brain signal pattern that the computer then interpreted as “move left,” or bending his elbow to move the object right, explains co-principal investigator Wei Wang, assistant professor of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

“He mentally associated specific motor imageries with desired movement direction,” he says. “It required concentration and patience, but this process seemed to get easier for him with practice, just like when someone learns to drive a car with a manual transmission.

“In future studies, we also will test other approaches, including the participant simply thinking up for up, down for down, and so on.”

After about eight sessions, Hemmes tackled more complicated tasks. While wearing special goggles to properly view a three-dimensional TV screen, he moved the ball in the previous directions, and also to the front or back.

He also practiced moving the arm in all directions, culminating in the joyful moments after formal testing had been completed when he reached out to Wang and to his girlfriend.

Tyler-Kabara removed the ECoG brain grid and wiring in a short operation the next day.

Tests continue

The researchers are now analyzing the data, and are seeking at least five more adults with spinal cord injuries or brainstem strokes who have very little or no use of their hands and arms for additional studies.

They also are looking for participants for a year-long trial of another kind of brain-computer interface that is a 10-by-10 array of tiny electrode points that penetrate the brain tissue by less than 1/10th of an inch and pick up signals from 100 individual neurons.

Two of these grids will be put in place, one in the brain region that controls hand movement, and one in the region that controls the arm, says co-principal investigator Andrew Schwartz, Ph.D., professor of neurobiology.

“We anticipate that these penetrating grids can pick up very clear signals from the brain to reveal what motion is intended by the participant,” Schwartz says. “The second grid will allow us to see what might be possible in controlling the fine movement of the fingers and hand, which is far more complicated but also could offer more useful function for the participant.”

In his other experiments, a monkey implanted with the penetrating grid has been able to use an APL arm to reach out and hold a doorknob-like object, building on earlier work in which a monkey was able to grasp a marshmallow with a gripper device on a less sophisticated robotic arm and feed the treat to itself.

The team plans to make the technology wireless, and to include sensors in the prosthesis that can send signals back to the brain to simulate sensation.

It might be possible to connect brain-computer interfaces to existing devices that stimulate muscle fibers in the arm and hand, in effect bypassing the spinal cord injury to allow these individuals to use their own limbs again, the researchers say. That approach could be studied in future trials.

The project is being funded by the National Institutes of Health; the U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, as well as the University of Pittsburgh.

For more information about the trials, call 1-800-533-UPMC (8762).

More news from the University of Pittsburgh: www.upmc.com/MediaRelations

chat3 Comments

You are free to share this article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported license.

3 Comments

  1. brain shirts

    The whole field of neuroprosthetics is really quite exciting and seems to be growing exponentially these last few years. It looks like this research is using single neuron recordings in motor cortex to decode movement direction. The article mentions the possibility of providing feedback signals to the brain to somatosensory areas. Has this been done yet in monkeys or humans? How far along is this technology? Very interesting article.

  2. Stump Beefknob

    Fascinating. I just recently watched a BBC Horizon episode(Human 2.0, 2006) that featured this research team and their advances with the monkeys. I’m very happy to see them having human volunteers to help push this groundbreaking research forward.

  3. Ketty

    Brilliant! such findings can give hope to spinal cord injured individuals and maybe it could also be tried in other disorders that require functional abilities. Especially disorders that make use of behavoiral approaches.

We respect your privacy.