Baseball

No breaking curveball? Say it ain’t so

USC (US) — No pitcher can make a curveball “break” or a fastball “rise.” What hitters—and fans—think they see is simply an illusion, new research shows.

Led by Arthur Shapiro of American University and Zhong-Lin Lu of the University of Southern California, the researchers explain the illusion of the curveball’s break in a publicly available study in the journal PLoS ONE.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTkzlphqBLA

The study comes a year after the same group won the prize for best illusion at the Vision Sciences annual meeting with a demonstration of how an object falling in a straight line can seem to change direction. That demonstration led to debates among baseball fans over the existence of the break in curveballs, breaking balls, and sliders.

There is no debate in the researchers’ minds.

“The curveball does curve, but the curve has been measured and shown to be gradual,” Shapiro says. “It’s always going to follow a parabolic path. But from a hitter’s point of view, an approaching ball can appear to break, drop or do a whole range of unusual behaviors.”

To many batters and pitchers, a break is a deviation from the relatively straight path of a fastball. In that sense, all curveballs break.

The authors of the study use the term to describe an apparent sudden drop or other change in trajectory as the ball nears home plate. That, they say, is an illusion.

The PLoS ONE study explains the illusion and relates the perceived size of the break to the shifting of the batter’s eye between central and peripheral vision.

“If the batter takes his eye off the ball by 10 degrees, the size of the break is about one foot,” says Lu, professor of psychology and biomedical engineering at USC.

He explained that batters tend to switch from central to peripheral vision when the ball is about 20 feet away, or two-thirds of the way to home plate. The eye’s peripheral vision lacks the ability to separate the motions of the spinning ball, Lu says. In particular, it gets confused by the combination of the ball’s velocity and spin.

The result is a gap between the ball’s trajectory and the path as perceived by the batter. The gap is small when the batter switches to peripheral vision, but gets larger as the ball travels the last 20 feet to home plate.

As the ball arrives at the plate, the batter switches back to central vision and sees it in a different spot than expected. That perception of an abrupt change is the “break” in the curveball that frustrates batters.

“Depending on how much and when the batter’s eyes shift while tracking the ball, you can actually get a sizable break,” Lu said. “The difference between central and peripheral vision is key to understanding the break of the curveball.”

A similar illusion explains the “rising fastball,” Lu added.

Watch the ball
The obvious remedy for a batter, repeated by parents and coaches everywhere, is to “keep your eye on the ball.”

That is easier said than done, according to the authors. As the ball nears home plate, its size in the batter’s field of view spills out of the eye’s central vision.

“Our central vision is very small,” Shapiro says. “It’s the size of the tip of your thumb at arm’s length. When an object falls outside of that region, strange perceptions can occur.”

Lu noted that the spin of the ball tends to draw the eye to the side, making it even harder for the batter to keep the ball in central vision.

“People’s eyes have a natural tendency to follow motion,” Lu explains.

His advice to hitters: “Don’t trust your eyes. Know the limitations of your visual system. This is something that can be trained, probably.”

Lu, Shapiro and their co-authors plan to build a physical device to test the curveball illusion. Their study was carried out with volunteers tracking the movement of a disk on a computer monitor.

To the authors’ knowledge, the PLoS ONE study represents the first attempt to explain the break in the curveball purely as a visual illusion. Others have tried to explain the break as a result of the hitter overestimating the speed of a pitch.

Truth vs. TV
Responding to comments from baseball fans, Lu agrees that on television, pitches filmed from behind home plate appear to break. He called it a “geometric illusion” based on the fact that for the first part of a pitch, the viewer sees little or no vertical drop.

The ball is falling at the same rate throughout the pitch, Lu explains, but because the pitcher tosses the ball at a slight upward angle, the first part of the pitch appears more or less flat.

As a result, the drop of the ball near home plate surprises the eye.

For Shapiro and Lu, who have studied visual perception for many years, the PLoS ONE results go beyond baseball.

“Humans constantly shift objects between central and peripheral vision and may encounter effects like the curveball’s break regularly,” the authors write. “Peripheral vision’s inability to separate different visual signals may have far-reaching implications in understanding human visual perception and functional vision in daily life.”

The research was partially supported by the National Eye Institute.

More news from USC: http://uscnews.usc.edu/

chat6 Comments

You are free to share this article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported license.

6 Comments

  1. Michael Domingo

    An illustration would have done wonders here. I was fully expecting some animated sequence showing the shift from central to peripheral vision in the video.

  2. Roy Niles

    Why not try to explain then how the pitcher knows to create the differences in illusion between a curveball and a slider, for example. Some parabolic differences must be at play here. How do the fingers and knuckles affect the illusions differently, etc.? Questions that should be addressed, even if the answers have so far eluded us.

  3. PJM

    This is BS. There are numerous high-speed photo studies showing baseballs clearly break from a straight line, and not moving in a parabola. Set up a high-speed camera perpendicular to the pitch and see what you get. Balls also break left to right (“down and in” pitch) and that is clearly visible on slow motion replays. That does not involve the eye shifting from central to peripheral vision, since the object the eye is viewing (the TV screen) does not move.

  4. Jill

    PJM- do you have links to any of the photo studies? or the slow motion replays? I’d be interested to see them.

  5. Anonymous

    The curveball absolutely breaks. This is obvious from a physical perspective to anyone who has ever played the game. For example, try using a pitching machine and see the difference from the location of where the ball ends up on a fastball vs a curveball or breaking pitch.

  6. mike

    Some of yall have reading comprehension issues.

We respect your privacy.