GEORGIA TECH (US) — A new wearable system measures the physical environment of an explosion and collects information that could match a soldier’s experience to his or her long-term medical outcome.
Improvised explosive devices (IEDs) are becoming a global problem for the US armed forces. To prevent injuries to soldiers and provide better care to those who are injured, the US military is striving to better understand how blasts impact the human body.
Douglas Woods, a research scientist and IBESS program manager, poses with a mannequin equipped with the Integrated Blast Effect Sensor Suite system. (Credit: Gary Meek/Georgia Tech)
In response to a request from the Army’s Rapid Equipping Force (REF), researchers at the Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI) developed the Integrated Blast Effect Sensor Suite (IBESS).
IBESS is the first system to acquire integrated, time-tagged data during an explosive event—whether soldiers are on the ground or riding in a vehicle—and can later help recreate a holistic picture of what happened.
There are two parts to a blast: a shock wave that travels at supersonic speed, and compressed air, which travels in front of the shock wave. Both can cause considerable damage to the human body, but the exact effects are unclear.
“No one knows to what extent overpressure or acceleration causes injuries,” says Marty Broadwell, a principal research scientist who manages the GTRI’s projects with REF. “Nor do we know how quickly an injury will show up, how long it will last or which soldiers are more resistant to harm than others. The only way to understand the impact of a blast is to collect data, which is precisely what IBESS does.”
How it works
IBESS features two major subsystems: a unit worn by the soldier and a vehicle sensor suite. The soldier system is contained in a canvas pouch, which attaches to a soldier’s armor between his or her shoulder blades. A recorder in the pouch connects to four pressure sensors, two on the back and two on straps that hang over the front of the shoulders.
Because these sensors face different quadrants, the unit captures directionality and more information than previous blast gauges.
“Soldiers already carry considerable gear, so reducing the weight of the body unit and power consumption of its batteries drove many design decisions,” says Brian Liu, a research engineer who served as technical lead on the project.
For example, the recorder in the soldier body unit remains in sleep mode until pressure or shock waves hit a certain threshold, causing it to wake and begin recording data. This allows the system to have longer battery life and remain relatively transparent to the wearer.
The vehicle system serves a dual purpose: It records blast events that affect the vehicle, but also interacts and automatically links with the soldier system. When a soldier enters a vehicle, a base station installed in seats transmits RFID signals. If the soldier system has stored any data, these signals initiate a Bluetooth connection that enables two-way communication and data transfer.
This semi-passive RFID technology is proximity based: transmission and reception occur only at very close range, so IBESS can identify a soldier’s precise location in the vehicle.
Sensors are also installed on the vehicle’s interior frame and seats. If an explosion or rollover occurs, these sensors collect linear acceleration and angular rotation data. The soldier system also wakes up and begins to record and transmit data. A single board computer aggregates data from both the vehicle and soldier systems and then passes it on to a rugged black box for final storage.
IBESS is specifically designed to withstand tremendous forces of an IED explosion.
“Materials, mounting strategies, and mechanical isolation strategies have been used to ensure the devices successfully capture data in ‘survivable’ events,” Liu explains. “We first conducted research on what kinds of magnitudes of blasts were survivable for mounted and dismounted operations and then performed many tests at those levels for verification.”
- Synchronized data: Unlike earlier generations of blast gauges, all data in IBESS is time-tagged, using GPS time as common time source. “Using this data we can rebuild an event,” Liu explains. “Even though soldiers aren’t wired together, we’ll know they were in the same vehicle and experienced the same event—and can assess how an event propagated through.”
- Scalability: The researchers used as many off-the-shelf and standard components as possible. “This open architecture makes it easier to expand the system,” observes Douglas Woods, research scientist and IBESS program manager.
- Anonymity: By leveraging the Department of Defense’s Common Access Card (CAC) system’s Personal Key Identifier (PKI), IBESS can collect information uniquely tied to individual soldiers. Use of the PKI makes the data virtually anonymous so other researchers can study it without compromising privacy or containing personally identifiable information.
The system has been issued to more than 650 troops and will be installed on 42 vehicles in Afghanistan.
Understanding the challenge
“If you don’t understand the context in which a device will be used, you won’t be collecting the right information, says Shean Phelps, a principal research scientist. A retired Army officer, Phelps was a Special Forces (Green Beret) weapons, medic, and team sergeant before becoming a physician.
Traumatic brain injury has become a greater concern in recent years. “Because of improved equipment and medical services, people are surviving severe explosions,” Phelps explains. “Yet we lack a clear understanding of blast-induced injuries on the human nervous system. Mild traumatic brain injury is a particular concern because it has a wide range of symptoms and doesn’t show up reliably in tests, so we can’t effectively diagnose, treat and manage its long-term effects.”
With IBESS, complex contextual data can be collected to link soldiers’ experiences with their medical records and later correlate a blast event to traumatic brain injury. IBESS is a major step forward for both the medical and engineering communities, Phelps says: “We now have a platform that’s dramatically different from previous efforts to collect blast data because it’s time-tagged, fully integrated between humans and vehicles, able to pinpoint an individual’s location in a vehicle—and able to accept data from any sensor.”
In ongoing work, researchers are building a structured database and analytical tools for the data that IBESS collects. Researchers are installing sensors in the ear-cup of communications headsets worn by soldiers, which measure linear and rotational acceleration on six axes. After testing, these headsets will be issued to 200 Army Rangers.
Currently IBESS only captures environmental data. Yet because of its open architecture, other diagnostic capabilities can be easily integrated. For example, sensors could be added to monitor heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen and hydration levels, body temperature, and EKG activity.
With such biometric sensors, IBESS could evaluate soldiers’ physical condition in training or on the battlefield for triage purposes or to assess their ability to do a certain job. Data from the system could be used to improve equipment and vehicle design. For example, gear might be developed to divert a shock wave or change its frequency if a particular frequency is shown to damage the brain. IBESS could also be adapted for non-military applications, such as monitoring construction workers, race car drivers, or elderly people in their homes.
“Collecting physical data on the blast environment is the critical first step before the system can be made medically predictive,” stresses Woods. “An explosion is a physical phenomenon. In order to understand the extent of injuries and how to prevent them, you must first understand the physics.”
Source: Georgia Tech