forest_floor_525

New forests trap carbon underfoot

U. MICHIGAN (US) — Growing trees on formerly non-forested land can accumulate soil carbon that helps offset carbon emissions and climate change, say researchers.

Surface appearances can be so misleading: In most forests, the amount of carbon held in soils is substantially greater than the amount contained in the trees themselves.

If you’re a land manager trying to assess the potential of forests to offset carbon emissions and climate change by soaking up atmospheric carbon and storing it, what’s going on beneath the surface is critical.

But while scientists can precisely measure and predict the amount of above-ground carbon accumulating in a forest, the details of soil-carbon accounting have been a bit fuzzy.

Two researchers and their colleagues helped to plug that knowledge gap by analyzing changes in soil carbon that occurred when trees became established on different types of nonforested soils across the United States.

In a paper published online today in the Soil Science Society of America Journal, they looked at lands previously used for surface mining and other industrial processes, former agricultural lands, and native grasslands where forests have encroached.

University of Michigan ecologist Luke Nave and his colleagues found that, in general, growing trees on formerly nonforested land increases soil carbon. Previous studies have been equivocal about the effects of so-called afforestation on soil carbon levels.

“Collectively, these results demonstrate that planting trees or allowing them to establish naturally on nonforested lands has a significant, positive effect on the amount of carbon held in soils,” says Nave, an assistant research scientist at the Biological Station and in the department of ecology and evolutionary biology.

“These forest soils represent a significant carbon reservoir that is helping to offset carbon emissions that lead to climate change,” says Nave, lead author of the paper.

Large and rapid increases in soil carbon were observed on forested land that had previously been used for surface mining and related industrial processes. On a post-mining landscape, the amount of soil carbon generally doubled within 20 years of mining termination and continued to double every decade or so after that.

The changes after cultivated farm fields were abandoned and trees became established are much subtler, though still significant. This type of tree establishment—which has been widespread in recent decades in the northeastern United States and portions of the Midwest—takes about 40 years to cause a detectable increase in soil carbon.

But at the end of a century’s time, the amount of soil carbon averages 15 percent higher than when the land was under cultivation, with the biggest increases (up to 32 percent) in the upper two inches of the soil.

In places where trees and shrubs have encroached into native grassland, soil carbon increased 31 percent after several decades, according to the study. That type of incursion is occurring throughout the Great Plains, from the Dakotas all the way to northern Texas, and is largely due to suppression of wildfires.

“Our work helps those tasked with understanding and managing the carbon balance of US lands by putting a number on the changes in soil carbon that occur during this sort of land-use transition,” Nave says.

Most of the organic carbon in forest soils comes from the growth and death of roots and their associated fungi, he says.

The study involved a reexamination of 46 research papers published between 1957 and 2010, as well as an analysis of 409 soil profiles from the National Soil Carbon Network database.

Co-authors of the new article are Chris Swanston of the US Forest Service, Umakant Mishra of the Argonne National Laboratory, and Knute Nadelhoffer, director of the Biological Station and a professor in the department of ecology and evolutionary biology.

The US Forest Service and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture supported the research.

Source: University of Michigan

chat3 Comments

You are free to share this article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported license.

3 Comments

  1. Taylor

    This is inspiring, there is always hope.

  2. Tom Tereszkiewicz

    I didn’t know that fungi could be a big carbon sink. When they say “carbon,” are they talking CO2? I know this gas can cause global warming but is it a pollutant as well?

  3. Tom Tereszkiewicz

    I didn’t know that fungi can also act as a carbon sponge. Does that include soot particles that pollute the air that are carbon based?

We respect your privacy.