"Methane emissions make it a disastrous idea to consider shale gas as a bridge fuel, letting society continue to use fossil fuels over the next few decades," says Robert Howarth. (Credit: Tim Evanson/Flickr)

climate change

Did the E.P.A. miscount natural gas emissions?

Thanks to a heavier dose of methane emissions resulting from increased use of shale gas, greenhouse gas emissions in the US may have been rising rapidly over the last seven years.

The US Environmental Protection Agency, however, suggests there has been a decline in measurable atmospheric greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel use in the US over that time.

The EPA’s computation may be in error—by a wide margin—due to problematic accounting for natural gas, the so-called “bridge” fuel.

In 2013, the EPA has estimated greenhouse gas emissions in the US—including methane from natural gas—at about 6 petagrams, or 6,000,000,000,000,000 grams into the atmosphere.

By using better accounting for methane as a key greenhouse contributor, the emissions to the atmosphere are closer to 9.5 petagrams, according to Robert Howarth, a professor of ecology and environmental biology at Cornell University. By 2040, greenhouse gas emissions from US fossil fuel use (including methane) could be close to 12 petagrams.

“The EPA has seriously underestimated the importance of methane emissions in general—and from shale gas in particular,” says Howarth, a fellow in Cornell’s Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future, who reports the findings in the journal Energy Science and Engineering.

“As a result, the federal government has been stating that total greenhouse gas emissions from energy use in the US have been steadily declining since 2008—which they attribute to exchanging shale gas for coal for electricity generation—although other studies say the economic downturn was more important.”

[How fracking leads to micro earthquakes]

Howarth says methane accounts for 40 percent of total US greenhouse gas emissions. Shale gas development over the past 8 years may be further increasing the rising average temperature of the Earth, compared to the pre-industrial baseline.

Methane resides in the atmosphere for just over a decade, a relatively short time compared to carbon dioxide, which lasts for hundreds of years. However, methane is 100 times more powerful than carbon dioxide as a global warming agent in the atmosphere. Curbing methane emission reductions leads to instant atmospheric concentration reductions that significantly slow global warming rates almost immediately, says Howarth.

Within the next 15 years, Earth will warm to very dangerous levels, doubling the total increase in the average temperature that has occurred since the start of the industrial revolution to now, says Howarth. Tipping points in the climate system may kick in and lead to runaway global warming.

[The U.S. natural gas system is leaking methane]

The natural gas industry is the largest source of methane emissions in the US. By reducing methane and soot (black carbon) emissions, society can buy time while moving aggressively toward a renewable energy economy, says Howarth.

While it is essential to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, this alone would result in no measurable improvement on global warming rates in less than 30 years, he says.

“Methane emissions make it a disastrous idea to consider shale gas as a bridge fuel, letting society continue to use fossil fuels over the next few decades,” Howarth says. “Rather, we must move as quickly as possible away from all fossil fuels—shale gas, conventional natural gas, coal, and oil—and toward a truly sustainable energy future using 21st-century technologies and wind and solar power.”

Source: Cornell University

Related Articles