If you spoke Chinese or some other language as a young child but don’t speak it now, you probably assume you’ve forgotten it. But a recent study suggests your brain hasn’t.
In fact that “forgotten” first language could have a lot to do with what goes on in your brain when you speak today.
Researchers say the finding is important because it not only shows how the brain becomes wired for language, but also how that hard-wiring can change and adapt over time in response to new language environments. The research has implications for understanding how brain plasticity functions, and could also be important when creating educational practices geared to different types of learners.
For a new study, three groups of children (aged 10-17) with very different linguistic backgrounds were asked to perform a task that involved identifying French pseudo-words (such as vapagne and chansette).
One group was born and raised in unilingual French-speaking families. Children in the second group were adopted from China into a French-speaking family before age three, stopped speaking Chinese, and from that point on heard and used only French. Children in the third group were fluently bilingual in Chinese and French.
[Blind kids rely on ‘visual brain’ to learn language]
As the children responded to the words they heard, researchers used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to look at which parts of their brains were activated.
Although all groups performed the tasks equally well, the areas of the brain that were activated differed between the groups. In monolingual French children with no exposure to Chinese, areas of the brain, notably the left inferior frontal gyrus and anterior insula, expected to be involved in processing of language-associated sounds were activated.
However, among both the children who were bilingual (Chinese/French) and those who had been exposed to Chinese as young infants and had then stopped speaking it, additional areas of the brain, particularly the right middle frontal gyrus, left medial frontal cortex, and bilateral superior temporal gyrus were also activated.
Chinese children who had been adopted into unilingual French families and no longer spoke Chinese (and so were functionally unilingual at the time of testing) still had brains that processed language in a way that is similar to bilingual children.
[New languages re-wire brains of all ages]
“During the first year of life, as a first step in language development, infants’ brains are highly tuned to collect and store information about the sounds that are relevant and important to the language they hear around them,” says Lara Pierce, a doctoral student and first author of the study.
“What we discovered when we tested the children who had been adopted into French-language families and no longer spoke Chinese, was that, like children who were bilingual, the areas of the brain known to be involved in working memory and general attention were activated when they were asked to perform tests involving language. These results suggest that children exposed to Chinese as infants process French in a different manner to monolingual French children.”
The findings, published in the journal Nature Communications, speak to the unique and lasting influence of early language experience on later brain organization, as well as to the brain’s ability to adapt to new language environments in order to gain proficiency in a new language, the researchers say.
“The adopted children we tested have an interesting background because they were exposed to one language from birth, but completely discontinued that language at a young age when they were adopted into families who speak a different language,” Pierce says. “This is very interesting from a language development perspective because it allows us to look at the influence of just that very early period of language development on later language processing, separately from the effects of ongoing exposure to one or more languages.”
The researchers are interested in knowing whether similar areas of the brain would be activated if the languages that had been “lost” and “gained” through adoption were closer together than Chinese and French, such as French and Spanish for example.
The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, and the Fonds de recherches sur la société et culture, the G.W. Stairs Foundation, and the Centre for Research on Brain Language and Music contributed to the work.
Source: McGill University