In UK, bikes safer than cars for young guys

UCL (UK) — Young men in England who drive face an almost five times greater risk of being hurt per hour than those who ride a bike.

Researchers looked at hospital admissions and deaths in England between 2007 and 2009 for pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers that were segregated by age group and sex. Using National Travel Survey data for the same time period, the team converted the distance traveled by each age group, sex, and mode of transport into time spent traveling using mean trip speeds.

“What we found is that risks were similar for men aged between 21 and 49 for all three modes of transport and for female pedestrians and drivers aged 21 and 69 years,” says lead author Jennifer Mindell of the department of epidemiology and public health at University College London.

“However, we found that for young male cyclists between 17 and 20 years of age, cycling was markedly safer than traveling by car.

“Perceived road danger is a strong disincentive to cycling and many potential cyclists do not ride on the road due to safety concerns,” Mindell says. “But research regarding the safety of cycling tends to be distorted by a number of errors which are found repeatedly in published papers and policy documents, with many substantially overstating cycling injuries and under-reporting pedestrian injuries.”

As reported in the journal PLoS One, those most at risk when traveling are men between the ages of 17 and 20 for driving, males older than 70 for cycling, and females older than 70 for walking. In general, fatality rates were substantially higher among males than females.

The team compared the UK data with figures from the Netherlands—a country widely perceived to be bike friendly. They found a similar pattern in both countries, with teenage male cyclists less likely to suffer serious injury or death than those traveling by car.

“This research dispels the idea that risk for UK cyclists is substantially higher than for drivers or pedestrians, and hopefully will encourage more people to take up something which is not only good for health, but also the environment,” Mindell says.

“An individual who cycles one hour a day for 40 years would cover about 180,000 km, whilst accumulating only a one in 150 chance of fatal injury. This is lower than for pedestrians who face a higher fatality rate per kilometer traveled,” she adds. “The health benefits of cycling are much greater than the fatality risk.”

Source: UCL

chat4 Comments


  1. Pia

    What does this story really tells us about the (car) driving habits of young male drivers, that they’re reckless and more cautious when they feel vunerable?
    It’d be nice if a bus full of people didn’t have to slowly roll behind a cyclist & imo cyclist should have their own paths, & preferably not the sort that suddenly vanish.

  2. kimbee

    Pia – exactly! This research is pointless. Young men act like boy racers in cars and have a high chance of getting hurt. Cyclists don’t because they’re on a bicycle. It’s not really a surprise is it?

  3. Jason

    With the increasing number of cars on the street,it is indeed a nightmare to walk a couple of blocks down the street with such heavy traffic.Also,the rise in number of cars has resulted in a lot of health related issues as well as environmental issues because,the carbon dioxide released by combustion of fuel is the major cause of global warming and also we have become so accustomed to the idea of luxury that we do not care to walk a few blocks but rather travel by car.Cycling is indeed a really healthy workout regime.So keep riding,stay healthy and keep the environment clean.

  4. Kabir

    Off course, It supposed to be :)

We respect your privacy.