STANFORD (US) — White Republicans and Southern evangelicals are most likely to claim reverse discrimination, but not because of a shared ideology, research shows.
The findings suggest that common stereotypes of white people concerned with “reverse racism”—the stereotype of the “angry white male,” for instance—are not the whole story.
“We talk about whites who claim reverse discrimination a lot, but we don’t often study them systematically, ” says Stanford University sociology Professor Aliya Saperstein.
“The issue of reporting racial discrimination is such a loaded one. So, we were curious about who the white people were who would say out loud to a survey interviewer that they had been treated unfairly because of their race. What makes them different?”
Using data from a 2006 survey of American racial and religious diversity, Saperstein, along with fellow sociologist Damon Mayrl, found that the answer varies depending on where you are.
In the South, the most likely discrimination reporters are evangelical Christians. Elsewhere, it’s Republicans.
The reasons for this aren’t ideological—the specifics of people’s religious or political beliefs seem to make no difference. Instead, the researchers suggest, Southern evangelical churches and the GOP are acting as regional communities for racially disaffected whites.
While the study shows whites who report racial discrimination are more likely to be recently unemployed and pessimistic about their future, they are also more likely to say they have daily contact with non-whites, and count at least one non-white person among their eight closest friends.
“You have to look beyond the simple view of who’s claiming racial discrimination,” says Mayrl, a professor at Universidad Carlos III de Madrid and first author of the study published in Social Science Research. “There is no singular profile of the white discrimination reporter.”
Real or imagined?
It’s often difficult to say whether claims of discrimination are real or imagined. Still, the mere perception of racial prejudice can have real-world consequences.
For instance, Saperstein says, both whites and minorities who feel racially discriminated against experience worsened mental and even physical health. Discrimination reporters have also been found to trust the government less and experience more negative relationships with family members.
“Perceiving discrimination has a host of consequences for well-being,” she says. “Not just for individuals, but for society as a whole. It almost doesn’t matter whether they really experienced any unfair treatment; what matters is they believe they did.”
Objectively real or not, the researchers found that 8 percent of whites nationwide says they had experienced racial discrimination in the past three years. This number was significantly higher in the South, jumping to 11 percent.
Haven for disaffected whites
Particularly overrepresented among Southerners reporting racial discrimination were evangelical Protestants, who accounted for 60 percent of the reverse discrimination reports in the South.
Other sociologists have suggested a connection between evangelical Christianity’s individualistic theology and how evangelicals understand racial inequality. But neither theology nor devotion—how often they prayed, how often they went to church—affects the likelihood of white Southern evangelicals reporting racial discrimination.
Instead, the researchers point to the church’s historical role as a booster for the racial order of the Old South. Southern evangelical churches were involved in morally justifying slavery before the Civil War and in defending segregation well into the 20th century.
“Southern evangelical churches appear distinctive from churches elsewhere, and we think that has to do with how they have helped their members understand the racial order in the past,” says Mayrl. “We’re taking the focus a little off the theology and putting it on the social structures in which people live.”
Outside the South, evangelicals were no more likely to report racial discrimination than any other group. Republicans, on the other hand—who report at average or below-average rates in the South—were significantly more likely to say they had been treated unfairly on the basis of their race.
The political conservatism of someone’s beliefs did not help explain the likelihood that whites would perceive discrimination. Simply identifying as a member of the Republican Party was what mattered.
The researchers point to the fact that, outside the South, evangelical churches developed a different approach to race relations than their Southern counterparts.
Meanwhile, the Republican Party has actively pursued white voters who felt wronged by such policies as civil rights programs or affirmative action.
By serving as a haven for disaffected whites, the researchers say, the Republican Party outside the South may occupy the same institutional niche the evangelical church fills in the South.
“We can’t say whether these organizations are simply more attractive to whites who feel they have experienced discrimination, or whether they actually encourage whites to understand their situation in terms of racial discrimination,” says Mayrl. “But it’s clear that white discrimination reporters find different communities of support in different parts of the country.”
Source: Stanford University