Share this article

 Email

 Print

 

Republish this article

The text of this article by Futurity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License.

More
Health & Medicine

Gene makes heart stronger without exercise

Tough guts of female mice point to colitis

To protect jockeys, protect horses first

Block nerve ‘sprouts’ to ease arthritis pain

Paid sick days would slow down flu at work

Lower risk of hypertension for seniors who volunteer

Chip diagnoses infection in minutes, not days

Mom’s PCB exposure harms unborn baby

After abuse, mental health often goes untreated

A new study that offers insights into the effects of stress on pregnancy used birth records from Texas and meteorological information to identify children born in the state between 1996 and 2008 whose mothers were in the path of a major tropical storm or hurricane during pregnancy.

The children’s health at birth was compared with that of siblings whose gestation didn’t coincide with a major weather event.

Mothers living within 30 kilometers of a hurricane’s path during their third trimester were 60 percent more likely to have a newborn with abnormal conditions, which are detailed on birth records.

Those conditions included being on a ventilator for more than 30 minutes or experiencing meconium aspiration, which occurs when a newborn breathes in a mixture of meconium—or early feces—and amniotic fluid around the time of delivery. Increased risk was also found following exposure to weather-related stressors in the first trimester, while evidence was less clear for exposure in the second trimester.

The researchers were able to isolate the impact of stress caused by the storm from other factors, such as changes in the availability of health care in a storm’s aftermath.

The study breaks ground by using new—and potentially better—ways to measure the impact of prebirth stress on newborns and opens avenues for further research into the potential impact on such children’s later development, says lead researcher Janet Currie, professor of economics and public affairs at Princeton University.

“Probably the most important finding of our study is that it does seem like being subjected to stress in pregnancy has some negative effect on the baby, but that the effect is more subtle than some of the previous studies have suggested,” says Currie, who conducted the study with Maya Rossin-Slater, a doctoral candidate in the Department of Economics at Columbia University.

The research “really raises the bar in terms of identification of the effect of stressful events in-utero on birth outcomes,” says Anna Aizer, associate professor of economics and public policy at Brown University who was not involved in the study. “Previous work has not really been able to isolate the effect as well as Currie and Rossin-Slater have.”

Meconium aspiration—usually a sign of fetal distress—and other respiratory problems that necessitate a baby being placed on a ventilator can generally be treated successfully, but the study offers new paths for future research about the long-term health of children born in the wake of stressful events such as hurricanes.

“I think there’s every reason to believe that if you have a better measure of child health—like you knew this child was having breathing problems at birth—that might be a stronger predictor of longer-term outcomes,” Currie says. “There’s a lot of interest in this whole area of how things that happen very early in life can affect future outcomes.”

Previous research into the impact of similar types of stress has found changes in length of gestation and birth weight, but the new study didn’t find a significant effect on those measures.

One explanation for the difference is that the new study utilized data that allowed the researchers to control for changes in the population of an area around the time of a storm that could have affected the previous findings. Earlier research hasn’t been able to account for the way the population of an area changes around the time of a stressful event—with people of certain demographic groups more likely than others to move away or stay nearby.

The new study included data on eight hurricanes and tropical storms that hit any part of Texas between 1996 and 2008 and caused more than $10 million damage. The most damaging storms were Tropical Storm Allison in 2001, which caused more than $50 billion in damage and 40 deaths, and Hurricane Ike, which caused $19.3 billion in damage and 103 deaths.

Experiencing a hurricane or major tropical storm can have a significant impact on people that goes well beyond stress. However, the researchers were able to determine that findings related to abnormal health conditions at birth generally weren’t tied to disruption of medical care or property damage caused by the storms, such as damage to an expectant mother’s home that might lead to injury or increased risk of illness. They also found little consistent evidence that the stress associated with storms affected mothers’ behaviors, such as smoking, eating as reflected in weight gain, and use of prenatal care.

One potential cause of the health problems found in the study is an increase in stress hormones caused by the storm, which occurred in what is known as the neuroendocrine pathway.

“I think the takeaway finding is that it’s worth doing more focused research on those pathways and looking for more subtle effects on the fetus than just looking at birth weight and preterm delivery,” Currie says “And it would be really great if we could follow over time and see what happens to children who are affected by these types of events.”

The research could also have implications beyond the context of natural disasters, Aizer says.

“Previous work has shown poor mothers are exposed to more stressors. Currie and Rossin-Slater’s work suggests that exposure to stress might be one of the mechanisms explaining why poor women have worse birth outcomes. Policymakers concerned with improving the outcomes of poor families should consider these findings.”

The study, which is described in a National Bureau of Economic Research working paper, was supported by funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

More news from Princeton University: www.princeton.edu/main/news/