<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to create an &#8216;endless supply&#8217; of cells</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futurity.org/health-medicine/how-to-create-an-endless-supply-of-cells/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futurity.org/health-medicine/how-to-create-an-endless-supply-of-cells/</link>
	<description>Research news from leading universities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:07:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurel johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/health-medicine/how-to-create-an-endless-supply-of-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-405512</link>
		<dc:creator>laurel johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 00:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurity.org/?p=198792#comment-405512</guid>
		<description>I read your articles daily and find the selection interesting. I find that sometimes you are misleading in your terminology and do not know if this is from lack of expertise or a desire to make findings appear more astounding and get more readers. For example, in this article they have found a way to turn on/off genes in GPCs but your introduction to the article makes it sound like this will work for all stem cells. In other articles the use of stem cell type is also reserved for farther into the text. and


This can make it look like embryonic research is at the root of all these successes, which is far from true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read your articles daily and find the selection interesting. I find that sometimes you are misleading in your terminology and do not know if this is from lack of expertise or a desire to make findings appear more astounding and get more readers. For example, in this article they have found a way to turn on/off genes in GPCs but your introduction to the article makes it sound like this will work for all stem cells. In other articles the use of stem cell type is also reserved for farther into the text. and</p>
<p>This can make it look like embryonic research is at the root of all these successes, which is far from true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
