<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gene &#8216;cancer-proofs&#8217; rodent&#8217;s cells</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futurity.org/health-medicine/gene-cancer-proofs-rodents-cells/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futurity.org/health-medicine/gene-cancer-proofs-rodents-cells/</link>
	<description>Research news from leading universities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:52:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny Leonard</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/health-medicine/gene-cancer-proofs-rodents-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-1419</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny Leonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurity.org/?p=5118#comment-1419</guid>
		<description>The full text is available here: http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/10/23/0905252106.full.pdf+html.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The full text is available here: <a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/10/23/0905252106.full.pdf+html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/10/23/0905252106.full.pdf+html</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam del mundo</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/health-medicine/gene-cancer-proofs-rodents-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator>sam del mundo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurity.org/?p=5118#comment-1395</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your reply. i&#039;ve only been able to read your abstract (in PNAS), somehow, the whole article doesn&#039;t come up.. so if you don&#039;t mind one or two follow up questions..  IF &#039;p16&#039; refers to a ca. 16 kD protein, can one obtain sufficient material to do say, an  terminal AA sequence, and design  anti-sense oligos from that?
  And while it was not entirely clear to me (from the abstract), if p16 is part of the p53 pathway. wouldn&#039;t simple mutations of p53 show up in &#039;cancer&#039; of the mole rat (regardless of the presence of &#039;good&#039; p16)?  And while i can appreciate the role of p16 in &#039;solid&#039; tumours, has anybody tried to induce, say, a leukemia in the mole rat?
  i guess i am somewhat &#039;bothered&#039; by the absence of any kind of &#039;cancer&#039; in a multi-cellular organism (regardless of the &#039;robustness&#039; of p16, etc.).
 But very fascinating work..and good luck with your future studies.  cpacibo.
sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your reply. i&#8217;ve only been able to read your abstract (in PNAS), somehow, the whole article doesn&#8217;t come up.. so if you don&#8217;t mind one or two follow up questions..  IF &#8216;p16&#8242; refers to a ca. 16 kD protein, can one obtain sufficient material to do say, an  terminal AA sequence, and design  anti-sense oligos from that?<br />
  And while it was not entirely clear to me (from the abstract), if p16 is part of the p53 pathway. wouldn&#8217;t simple mutations of p53 show up in &#8216;cancer&#8217; of the mole rat (regardless of the presence of &#8216;good&#8217; p16)?  And while i can appreciate the role of p16 in &#8216;solid&#8217; tumours, has anybody tried to induce, say, a leukemia in the mole rat?<br />
  i guess i am somewhat &#8216;bothered&#8217; by the absence of any kind of &#8216;cancer&#8217; in a multi-cellular organism (regardless of the &#8216;robustness&#8217; of p16, etc.).<br />
 But very fascinating work..and good luck with your future studies.  cpacibo.<br />
sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vera Gorbunova</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/health-medicine/gene-cancer-proofs-rodents-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-1347</link>
		<dc:creator>Vera Gorbunova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurity.org/?p=5118#comment-1347</guid>
		<description>We are working on it.  The genome of naked mole rat is not sequenced, therefore before we can mutate or even just silence a gene we need to clone it.  We hope that with publication of this paper the NIH will be more willing to invest in sequencing of the naked mole rat genome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are working on it.  The genome of naked mole rat is not sequenced, therefore before we can mutate or even just silence a gene we need to clone it.  We hope that with publication of this paper the NIH will be more willing to invest in sequencing of the naked mole rat genome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam del mundo</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/health-medicine/gene-cancer-proofs-rodents-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-1331</link>
		<dc:creator>sam del mundo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurity.org/?p=5118#comment-1331</guid>
		<description>The obvious question:  Have they tried to mutate the p16?  and results??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The obvious question:  Have they tried to mutate the p16?  and results??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sally</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/health-medicine/gene-cancer-proofs-rodents-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-1318</link>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurity.org/?p=5118#comment-1318</guid>
		<description>how simply amazing. I have become deaf to hearing cancer research results as while they are interesting,  they all seem to tinker around the edges. But this seems like a whole new way to think about the situation. maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how simply amazing. I have become deaf to hearing cancer research results as while they are interesting,  they all seem to tinker around the edges. But this seems like a whole new way to think about the situation. maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Genes as Quiet as a Mouse: Why These Butt-Ugly Rodents Don&#8217;t Get Cancer &#124; Sustainable Suppers</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/health-medicine/gene-cancer-proofs-rodents-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-1311</link>
		<dc:creator>Genes as Quiet as a Mouse: Why These Butt-Ugly Rodents Don&#8217;t Get Cancer &#124; Sustainable Suppers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurity.org/?p=5118#comment-1311</guid>
		<description>[...] more about the study here, in Futurity, a fantastic new science news aggregator that publishes studies from various universities. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more about the study here, in Futurity, a fantastic new science news aggregator that publishes studies from various universities. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

