Health & Medicine - Posted by Tim Green-U. Texas on Tuesday, August 31, 2010 15:28 - 2 Comments    
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Drink a day keeps Grim Reaper away

Older adults who drink moderately are more likely to live longer across a 20-year follow-up than those who drink heavily or who don't drink at all. (Credit: iStockphoto)

U. TEXAS-AUSTIN (US)—Moderate drinking—about one to two drinks per day—reduces mortality among older and middle-aged adults.





A study appearing in Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, finds the health benefits of drinking among older adults are intrinsically linked to moderation.

Using data gathered from a larger study of late-life patterns of drinking, Charles Holahan, professor of psychology at the University of Texas at Austin, followed 1,824 older adults (1,142 men, 682 women) between the ages of 55 and 65 who were former or current drinkers for 20 years.

The information collected included daily alcohol consumption, sociodemographic factors, former problem-drinking status, health factors, and social behavioral factors.

A substantial part of the survival effect for moderate drinking among older adults is explained by confounding factors associated with alcohol abstention.

Compared to moderate drinkers, abstainers in the study sample included many former problem drinkers and individuals with more health problems and health risk factors (such as lower physical activity and more cigarette smoking) compared to moderate drinkers.

The researchers also found those who drank moderately were more likely to live longer across a 20-year follow-up than those who drank heavily or who didn’t drink at all.

The findings showed increases in mortality risk of 42 percent for heavy drinkers and 49 percent for abstainers in comparison to moderate drinkers.

Despite the health benefits of moderate drinking, Holahan emphasizes the need for common sense. One or two drinks a day may be beneficial for some, but drinking a lot more can be dangerous, he stresses.

“Older persons drinking alcohol should remember that consuming more than two drinks a day exceeds recommended alcohol consumption guidelines in the United States and is associated with increased falls, a higher risk of alcohol use problems, and potential adverse interactions with medications,” Holahan says.

Researchers from Stanford University contributed to the study.

More news from University of Texas at Austin: www.utexas.edu/news/

Please wait

2 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

WillWoodsIA
Sep 10, 2010 13:05

I object to the methodoligy and test populations used to draw the conclusions that this study seems to want to make: monthly averages do not serve as a good baseline for total alcohol consumption over a year, which can wildly fluxuate around holidays and religious observances such as Lent or Ramadan, indexing family salary together to calculate “social class” can lead to wildly disparate assignations, rough BMI calculations cannot capture the full picture of one’s body tissue makeup, and a variance in ethnic groups DEMONSTRATED by physiologists to vary in the body’s natural abilities to process and break-down alcohol will create natural outliers in the subject pool. I excercise two hours a day and run marathons and still would be marked as a “non-active person” under the ridiculous items they used to map physical activity, so it’s no surprise they have difficulty with that correlation. The CRI as a coping indicator also seems highly suspect: Am I really aware of the most stressful problem or stimulus that I encounter month to month and all of the ways my behavior changes because of it? They mention that women were overrepresented in the “moderate drinking” groups but give very little detail of important further confounds like institutional pressures (Military service where one is forbidden to drink), sleep quality (massive metabolism effects), alcohol tolerance levels. C’mon.

lrchicago
Nov 13, 2010 20:38

Shame on Charles Holahan for suggesting in his study that heavy drinkers live longer than people who abstain. Fox News and Time Magazine both went to town on his study with their title, “Heavy Drinkers outlive Non Drinkers”. Let’s use some common sense. Alcohol is a poison which is why a hangover follows heavy drinking. Alcohol is also a depressant which is why people on anti depressants are told not to drink. Alcohol is also addictive. A heavy drinker is at risk for becoming dependent on alcohol. I cannot believe that an individual who chooses not to drink and has a healthy lifestyle, (doesn’t smoke, is physically active, has a rich social life and healthy eating habits), will have a shorter life than a heavy drinker. I am the mother of a recovering alcoholic/drug abuser and know first hand the debilitating effects of “heavy” alcohol use. And as far as alcohol increasing socialibility, certain illegal drugs have the same effect. Alcohol use is so imbedded in our society that it seems we have to consume it in order to be sociable. I have no problem with people having a glass or two of wine with a meal, (I do myself), but it is not “healthy” and any more than that is harmful.

Leave a Comment

Comment

Research news from leading universities

Daily E-News


Browse By School

Follow Futurity

RSS feedsFacebookTwitter

Week's Most Discussed

  • Loading...

Media Partners

Alltop logo Pulse logo Flipboard logo Visual News logo The Conversation logo