Health & Medicine - Posted by Jennifer Fitzenberger-UC Irvine on Wednesday, October 28, 2009 19:36 - 7 Comments
Bad driving may be in the genes

Neurologist Steven Cramer, who studies brain repair after stroke and brain remodeling, published a study suggesting that bad driving may in part be genetically based. His work shows that people with a particular gene variant perform more than 20 percent worse on a driving test than people without it. (Credit: Steve Zylius/UC Irvine)
UC IRVINE (US)—Bad drivers may in part have their genes to blame. A recent study found that people with a particular gene variant performed more than 20 percent worse on a driving test than people without it—and a follow-up test a few days later yielded similar results. About 30 percent of Americans have the variant.
“These people make more errors from the get-go, and they forget more of what they learned after time away,” says Steven Cramer, University of California, Irvine, neurology associate professor and senior author of the study published recently in the journal Cerebral Cortex.
This gene variant limits the availability of a protein called brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) during activity. The protein keeps memory strong by supporting communication among brain cells and keeping them functioning optimally. When a person is engaged in a particular task, BDNF is secreted in the brain area connected with that activity to help the body respond.
Previous studies have shown that in people with the variant, a smaller portion of the brain is stimulated when doing a task than in those with a normal BDNF gene. People with the variant also don’t recover as well after a stroke. Given these differences, the researchers wondered: Could the variant affect an activity such as driving?
“We wanted to study motor behavior, something more complex than finger-tapping,” says Stephanie McHughen, graduate student and lead author of the study. “Driving seemed like a good choice because it has a learning curve and it’s something most people know how to do.”
The driving test was taken by 29 people—22 without the gene variant and seven with it. They were asked to drive 15 laps on a simulator that required them to learn the nuances of a track programmed to have difficult curves and turns. Researchers recorded how well they stayed on the course over time. Four days later, the test was repeated.
Results showed that people with the variant did worse on both tests than the other participants, and they remembered less the second time. “Behavior derives from dozens and dozens of neurophysiologic events, so it’s somewhat surprising this exercise bore fruit,” Cramer says.
The gene variant isn’t always bad, though. Studies have found that people with it maintain their usual mental sharpness longer than those without it when neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s, Huntington’s, and multiple sclerosis are present.
“It’s as if nature is trying to determine the best approach,” Cramer says. “If you want to learn a new skill or have had a stroke and need to regenerate brain cells, there’s evidence that having the variant is not good. But if you’ve got a disease that affects cognitive function, there’s evidence it can act in your favor. The variant brings a different balance between flexibility and stability.”
A test to determine whether someone has the gene variant is not commercially available.
“I’d be curious to know the genetics of people who get into car crashes,” Cramer says. “I wonder if the accident rate is higher for drivers with the variant.”
Researchers from the University of Florida took part in the study, which was funded by the National Institutes of Health.
For more UC Irvine news: www.uci.edu
Please wait
7 Comments
emc2
If I test positive, will my insurance premiums be risk-based priced? If I am positive with Huntington’s will I received a premium reduction? What will impact be on auto-based litigation?
Steven Cramer
In answer to question from emc2: We chose driving for two reasons. First, we wished to examine a relatively complex behavior that is motor-based. Second, a colleague already had the driving game set up, we evaluated it, and we concluded that it was perfect. The spirit of # 1 is that we wished to examine a task, a function, an occupational level activity rather than a simple repetitive task. This more closely emulates learning and skill complexity demands relevant to stroke recovery, the ultimate focus of my lab.
We (2009 Intl Stroke Conf) and others (Siironen et al, Stroke. 2007;38:2858-2860) have reported data that suggests that this same polymorphism does influence recovery from stroke. We are thus approaching this issue from two directions.
Steven Cramer
To R.Will Genes generally influence tendencies toward characteristics, with many factors, including experience, modifying gene effects. This is a strong gene, as its variation shows up as significant in this and related studies, but in itself it does not define an individual. Society and ethicists must determine how to use this information to establish policy.
emc2
Thanx for the response. I did not realize from the way the article was written that the research was tied to stroke research. I hope it will also be applied to the study and ellucidation of learning disabilities in children, if it is as relevant as it sounds. Why have we heard so little about this genetic variation?
Andrew.
Prof. Cramer,
Can you post a link to this study as it is in a journal? I can’t find one anywhere.
G
I agree with the study. I know people that come from a line of drivers in their family. Their kids are amazing drivers with skill and agility while I know several where the parents drive like the mad hatter and their kids drive just as bad…. Its funny because even their cars are all dented up… I know strange observation but great study, I agree
























Driving? Why did they leap to driving? This seems like it could have far greater implications in such topics as, say, learning and learning disabilities. Has someone already done that research? I’d like to know about that (maybe more.)