Health & Medicine - Posted by Dennis O'Shea-JHU on Thursday, September 2, 2010 15:17 - 5 Comments    
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Accidents kill minority pedestrians more often

Non-white pedestrians and those without health insurance face a significantly higher risk of death in car accidents than insured whites. (Credit: iStockphoto.com)

JOHNS HOPKINS (US)—Uninsured or minority pedestrians hit by cars are significantly more likely to die than insured whites with similar injuries.





The death rate disparity is compounded by the fact that minority pedestrians are far more likely than white pedestrians to be struck by motor vehicles.

“It’s a double whammy,” says Adil Haider, assistant professor of surgery at Johns Hopkins University and the study’s senior author.

“Minorities are much more likely to get injured by this mechanism and much more likely to die by this mechanism.”

Haider reviewed National Trauma Data Bank information on 26,404 patients hit by vehicles between 2002 and 2006. African-American patients had a 22 percent greater risk of death and Hispanic patients a 33 percent greater risk of death than white patients involved in similar crashes.

Uninsured patients had a 77 percent greater risk of death than those who were insured, even though the care they received was in emergency departments, long believed to be a great equalizer in health care delivery.

Details appear in the August issue of the journal Surgery.

“Do we treat minorities and the uninsured differently? I don’t think so, but we’ve got to ask the question,” says Haider, who is also co-director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research. “We don’t actually know what is leading to these disparities.”

Previous studies of other kinds of injuries and illnesses have shown that insurance status and race may increase mortality risk because of treatment delay or differences in services provided.

A greater prevalence of, or lack of treatment for, other conditions, such as obesity, diabetes, or hypertension, could also be factors that raise the risk of death among injured minority or uninsured pedestrian accident victims.

Since the underlying causes of the disparities can’t be easily answered, Haider says, policy makers need to focus in the short term on better pedestrian injury-prevention programs, particularly in the inner city, where many of these deadly crashes occur.

He points to successes in getting people to use seat belts and in getting parents to put their children in safety seats—two innovations that have saved lives. He concedes, however, that the problem of pedestrian injury may be more complicated.

More news from Johns Hopkins University: http://releases.jhu.edu/

Please wait

5 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Dr. O'
Sep 6, 2010 12:59

Could there also be a correlation with the length of time it requires for medical assistance to reach the victim? Some neighborhoods are difficult to find and giving wrong locations to 911 is common.

Chris
Sep 14, 2010 12:34

Wouldn’t a reason for the uninsured statistic be because that people that live in the city/urban environment have less need of a care, thus no car insurance. There are also more people walking on the streets, and like myself, also more people that jaywalk. So I’m not exactly sure what information pedistrians without insurance that are hit has really any relevance to the issue.

As for ethnic issues, I would guess some of that has to do with waiting time in emergency rooms in urban v. suburban environments would impact the time, too. I didn’t read the study but not taking into account where the accident’s occurred would certain impact the results

Peg
Sep 14, 2010 13:21

I did not read the study, but I believe it refers to the medically uninsured, not people without car insurance. I am certain that minorities and medically uninsured individuals do not receive the same level of medical care as others and although we don’t want to admit it, we know why the disparity exists.

Tim Eskridge
Sep 15, 2010 14:02

Uninsured victims I assume refers to health insurance, although I believe many auto policies contain coverage for pedestrian injuries. Insofar as uninsured patients probably are screened by, and in many cases receive care from house officers in the hospital, this may contribute to worse outcomes for these patients. In addition, patients taken to hospitals that aren’t trauma centers may do differently than those who are evacuated to designated trauma centers. Tim

Jett
Sep 16, 2010 18:26

If you look for an ethnic correlation in these kinds of statistics, you can always find it. That does not equate with causation or anything helpful. In my urban center, the population is roughly 80% African American–every statistic makes it look like African Americans are disproportionately affected, whether for good or ill, until you look at the underlying demographics. The truth of the matter is that the only color that matters is green. People who live in poor, less served, less accessible environments, urban or rural and regardless of race are and will always be more at risk. That should be part of the motivation to work one’s way out of those environments or to strive to improve them. It is idiotic to attempt to use such out of context statistics to indict the trauma service infrastructure that, overall, responds remarkably well to people of all races and economic levels. Plastering an essentially race-baiting headline across the JHU magazine is both fundamentally racist and a disservice to everyone who cares about safety for all people.

Leave a Comment

Comment

Research news from leading universities

Daily E-News


Browse By School

Follow Futurity

RSS feedsFacebookTwitter

Week's Most Discussed

  • Loading...

Media Partners

Alltop logo Pulse logo Flipboard logo Visual News logo The Conversation logo