babystar_ESO

Gaps around stars lead to planet pile-ups

U. ARIZONA (US) — In young solar systems emerging around baby stars, the popularity of some orbits over others leads to ‘planet pileups’ and ‘planet deserts.’

Computer simulations have revealed a plausible explanation for a phenomenon that has puzzled astronomers: Rather than occupying orbits at regular distances from a star, giant gas planets similar to Jupiter and Saturn appear to prefer to occupy certain regions in mature solar systems while staying clear of others.

“Our results show that the final distribution of planets does not vary smoothly with distance from the star, but instead has clear ‘deserts’—deficits of planets—and ‘pileups’ of planets at particular locations,” says Ilaria Pascucci, an assistant professor at the University of Arizona‘s Lunar and Planetary Laboratory.

“Our models offer a plausible explanation for the pileups of giant planets observed recently detected in exoplanet surveys,” says Richard Alexander of the University of Leicester in the United Kingdom.

Alexander and Pascucci identified high-energy radiation from baby sun-like stars as the likely force that carves gaps in protoplanetary disks, the clouds of gas and dust that swirl around young stars and provide the raw materials for planets. The gaps then act as barricades, corralling planets into certain orbits.

The exact locations of those gaps depend on the planets’ mass, but they generally occur in an area between 1 and 2 astronomical units from the star. One astronomical unit, or AU, marks the average distance from the Earth to the sun. The findings are published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

According to conventional wisdom, a solar system starts out from a cloud of gas and dust. At the center of the prospective solar system, material clumps together, forming a young star. As the baby star grows, its gravitational force grows as well, and it attracts dust and gas from the surrounding cloud.

Accelerated by the growing gravitation of its star, the cloud spins faster and faster, and eventually flattens into what is called a protoplanetary disk. Once the bulk of the star’s mass has formed, it is still fed material by its protoplanetary disk, but at a much lower rate.

“For a long time, it was assumed that the process of accreting material from the disk onto the star was enough to explain the thinning of the protoplanetary disk over time,” Pascucci explains. “Our new results suggest that there is another process at work that takes material out of the disk.”

That process, called photo-evaporation, works by high-energy photons streaming out of the star and heating the dust and gas on the surface of the protoplanetary disk.

“The disk material that is very close to the star is very hot, but it is held in place by the star’s strong gravity,” Alexander says. “Further out in the disk where gravity is much weaker, the heated gas evaporates into space.”

Even further out in the disk, the radiation emanating from the star is not intense enough to heat the gas sufficiently to cause much evaporation. But at a distance between 1 and 2 AU, the balancing effects of gravitation and heat clear a gap, the researchers found.

While studying protoplanetary disks, Pascucci found that gas on the surface of the disk was gravitationally unbound and leaving the disk system via photoevaporation, as Alexander had previously predicted. “These were the first observations proving that photoevaporation does occur in real systems,” she says.

Pascucci presented the findings at the 43rd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in The Woodlands, Texas on March 19.

Encouraged by those findings, Alexander and Pascucci then used the ALICE High Performance Computing Facility at the University of Leicester to simulate protoplanetary discs undergoing accretion of material to the central star that took the effects of photo-evaporation into account.

“We don’t yet know exactly where and when planets form around young stars, so our models considered developing solar systems with various combinations of giant planets at different locations and different stages in time,” Alexander says.

The experiments revealed that just as observations of real solar systems have shown, giant planets migrate inward before they finally settle on a stable orbit around their star. This happens because as the star draws in material from the protoplanetary disk, the planets are dragged along, like a celebrity caught in a crowd of fans.

However, the researchers discovered that once a giant planet encounters a gap cleared by photo-evaporation, it stays put.

“The planets either stop right before or behind the gap, creating a pile-up,” Pascucci says. “The local concentration of planets leaves behind regions elsewhere in the disk that are devoid of any planets. This uneven distribution is exactly what we see in many newly discovered solar systems.”

Once surveys for discovering extrasolar planet systems such as the Kepler Space Telescope project become more sensitive to outer giant planets, Alexander and Pascucci expect to find more and more evidence for the pileup of giant planets around 1 AU.

Pascucci says, “As we discover more exoplanets, we will be able to test these predictions in detail and learn more about the conditions under which planets form.”

The research was funded by the National Science Foundation and the UK’s Science & Technology Facilities Council.

More news from the University of Arizona: http://uanews.org

chat2 Comments

You are free to share this article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported license.

2 Comments

  1. viper

    you suck

  2. G. Lance

    We predict that protoplanetary disc clearing due to photoevaporation results in a pile-up of Jupiter-mass planets at 1–2AU, and we suggest that this mechanism may be responsible for the similar pile-up seen in recent exoplanet surveys.

    So, are they suggesting there are planetary pile up just inside and just outside the frost line for solar systems. Rcrit 2.5 AU for 1 solmass and Rcrit 0.1 AU for a very small red dwarf? What does Rcrit mean anyway, l’ol!?

We respect your privacy.