New understanding of how fish use a “sixth sense” to detect flows of water helps resolve a long-time mystery about how the creatures respond to their environment.
“We identified a unique layout of flow sensors on the surface of fish that is nearly universal across species, and our research asks why this is so,” explains Leif Ristroph, an assistant professor at New York University’s Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences and one of the study’s authors.
“The network of these sensors is like a ‘hydrodynamic antenna’ that allows them to retrieve signals about the flow of water and use this information in different behaviors.”
It’s well known that fish respond to changes in their fluid environment. These include avoiding obstacles, reducing swimming effort by slaloming between vortices, or whirlpools, and tracking changes in water flow left by prey—even without the aid of vision.
Along their sides
To explore how fish exploit flow information, the research team focused on a fish’s “lateral line”—a system of sensory organs known to detect both movement and vibration in the water that surrounds them—with particular consideration to the line’s sensory-laden canals that open to the environment through a series of pores.
They specifically focused on the placement of these canals along the body, noting that their location can help explain how a fish’s sixth sense functions. For instance, the concentration of these canals at the heads of blind cave fish seems well-suited for detecting obstacles.
To test their theory, the researchers created a plastic model of a rainbow trout that replicated the location of the fish’s canals and included illuminated markers used to detect the speed of surrounding water.
In their experiments, the model fish was put through a series of tests the replicated real-life aquatic conditions—changes in water flow that altered water pressure or mimicked the presence of “prey”—and examined where the canals were located in relation to strongest changes in water pressure.
The results show that, as predicted, the canal system is concentrated at locations on the body wherever strong variations in pressure occur.
Just as the shape of a TV or radio antenna is designed to detect electromagnetic signals, the fish’s canal system is like an antenna laid out on the body surface and configured to be sensitive to pressure changes.
The trouble with live fish
The team’s use of finely detailed models—developed with the help of a taxidermist who made custom molds from real trout—made it possible to record this data for the first time.
“You can’t put pressure sensors on a live fish and have it behave normally,” Liao says. “This was a creative way to use engineering and physics techniques to answer biological questions you can’t answer otherwise.”
The study’s other authors are James Liao, an assistant professor at the University of Florida’s Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience, and Jun Zhang, a professor of physics and mathematics at NYU and NYU Shanghai.
The National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Energy supported the work.