"Even though people could simply unfriend someone with different opinions, and there were certainly those who did that, there were many relationships that were able to be maintained," says Catherine Grevet. "Through a combination of behaviors on Facebook like hiding, tuning out, logging off, or avoiding certain conversations, people negotiated around those differences to stay connected." (Credit: Acy./Flickr)

Politics on Facebook can test friendship

A typical Facebook newsfeed is peppered with links, opinions, and jabs about the latest political topics.

A new study suggests that politics are the great divider. People who think the majority of their friends have differing opinions than their own engage less on Facebook.

For those who choose to stay logged in and politically active, the research finds that most tend to stick in their own circles, ignore those on the other side, and become more polarized.

Show us shared interests?

At the same time, the study suggests a few design changes that could allow the social media platform to bridge political differences. By displaying shared interests between friends during their prickly conversations, Facebook could help diffuse possible arguments and alleviate tension.

The research also notes that increasing exposure and engagement to weak ties could make people more resilient in the face of political disagreement.

“People are mainly friends with those who share similar values and interests. They tend to interact with them the most, a phenomenon called homophily,” says study leader Catherine Grevet, a PhD student at Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech). “But that means they rarely interact with the few friends with differing opinions. As a result, they aren’t exposed to opposing viewpoints.”

Facebook’s algorithms don’t help the cause. Newsfeeds are filled with the friends a person most often interacts with, typically those with strong ties. Grevet suggests that the social media site should sprinkle in a few status updates on both sides of political issues. That would expose people to different opinions, which are typically held by weak ties.

“Designing social media toward nudging users to strengthen relationships with weak ties with different viewpoints could have beneficial consequences for the platform, users, and society,” says Grevet.

Ignore and be quiet

The study surveyed more than 100 politically active Facebook users in the spring of 2013 amid debates about budgets cuts, gay marriage, and gun control regulations. The majority of participants were liberal, female, and under the age of 40, mirroring the traditional Facebook user.

More than 70 percent said they don’t talk about politics with their friends with different opinions. When they saw something they didn’t agree with, 60 percent said they ignored it and didn’t comment. When they did, sometimes it made the person question the relationship and disassociate and from the friend.

“Even though people could simply unfriend someone with different opinions, and there were certainly those who did that, there were many relationships that were able to be maintained,” says Grevet. “Through a combination of behaviors on Facebook like hiding, tuning out, logging off, or avoiding certain conversations, people negotiated around those differences to stay connected.”

That’s why she feels social media sites like Facebook could support those relationships better, for instance, by highlighting shared interests between acquaintances.

Grevet will present the study in February at the Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing conference in Baltimore.

Source: Georgia Tech

chat1 Comment

You are free to share this article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported license.

  1. testing

    Attractive part of content. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and in accession capital to assert that I acquire in fact enjoyed
    account your weblog posts. Anyway I’ll be subscribing for your augment or even I achievement you get admission to constantly rapidly.

We respect your privacy.