Earth & Environment - Posted by Nancy Ross-Flanigan-Michigan on Thursday, February 17, 2011 15:02 - 2 Comments    
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Warming shifts insect-plant interaction

Elevating carbon dioxide levels affects plant evolution by altering the selection pressure that plant-eating insects exert on plants like the common milkweed—one of monarch caterpillars' favorite snacks. (Credit: Rachel Vannette)

U. MICHIGAN (US) — Global warming and the associated higher carbon dioxide levels may affect plant evolution by altering the selection pressure that insects exert on plants.





Selection pressure induces changes in the genetic composition of a population. It works like this: if insects inflict too much damage on plants, the plants can’t reproduce as successfully, setting up a situation in which any plants that, by chance, have inherited insect-deterring traits are at an advantage.

Because of that advantage, such traits are likely to spread through the population, urged on by “pressure” from the insects.

Researchers investigated whether different genetic “families” of the common milkweed from a single population in Northern Michigan would respond differently to increasing carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere and if so, how those responses might affect the plants’ chances of being eaten by insects.

Milkweed is one of many plants that produce toxic or bitter chemical compounds to protect themselves from being eaten by insects. These chemical defenses are the result of a long history of interactions between the plants and insects such as monarch caterpillars that feed on them.

“Specifically, we examined the response of milkweed plants to elevated carbon dioxide in terms of plant growth, asexual reproduction, and the production of chemical and physical defenses,” says Rachel Vannette, a graduate student in Mark Hunter’s research group. Hunter is a professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Michigan.

Details of the research are published in Global Change Biology.

Although all plants grew larger in response to elevated carbon dioxide, and all plant families showed similar growth and reproductive responses, plant families responded differently to elevated carbon dioxide in their production of chemical and physical defenses against plant-eating insects.

In particular, their production of heart poisons called cardenolides differed. While some plant families responded to elevated carbon dioxide by increasing cardenolide production, most decreased production—by as much as 50 percent.

“That’s a big difference if you’re a caterpillar,” says Vannette. Because the insects that consume milkweed, including monarch caterpillars, choose their host plants carefully and select specific plants based on the plants’ concentration of toxic compounds, the specialist insects act as agents of selection on milkweed plants.

Countering the shift away from chemical defenses was a shift toward physical defenses and resistance.

“The plants had tougher leaves, and they were better at tolerating herbivory by caterpillars—they grew back faster,” Vannette says.

A common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) in flower. (Credit: Rachel Vannette)

Taken together, the results provide evidence that in response to elevated carbon dioxide, genetically-based differences in plant defense mechanisms and the changing plant-insect interactions that result may influence how plants adapt to changing climate.

Will the plants’ changing defense strategies help or hinder monarchs? “We don’t know yet,” Vannette says, “but that’s a question we’re investigating.”

The research was funded by the National Science Foundation.

More news from University of Michigan: www.ns.umich.edu/

Please wait

2 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Roy Niles
Feb 18, 2011 17:40

“Selection pressure” – a euphemism for self engineering functions that new biologists recognize but dare not speak its name?
“-setting up a situation in which any plants that, by chance, have inherited insect-deterring traits are at an advantage.”
Just how did chance manage to set up for that inheritance the myriads of complex deterrent and related behavioral strategies we find in plants, let alone the ostensibly more complex in animals? Nothing to do with the plants’ own experiences of environmental change as the source of pressure?
I know I keep asking this, and keeping getting no for an answer, but clearly a simple no is not the answer. And neither is coincidence an answer. It’s the question!

Jim Costopulos
Feb 19, 2011 12:29

This article links to the wrong paper for the research. Looks like it should be: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02316.x/pdf.

Leave a Comment

Comment

Research news from leading universities

Daily E-News


Browse By School

Follow Futurity

RSS feedsFacebookTwitter

Media Partners

Alltop logo Pulse logo Flipboard logo Visual News logo The Conversation logo

Week's Most Discussed

  • Loading...