Earth & Environment - Posted by George Foulsham-UC Santa Barbara on Tuesday, July 10, 2012 17:01 - 1 Comment
Study: Earth remains on unsustainable path
UC SANTA BARBARA (US) — Despite calls for sustainability and efforts to advance green initiatives, Earth is still headed for “unprecedented levels of damage and degradation” says a new UN assessment.
The UN Environment Programme released its fifth Global Environmental Outlook report—commonly known as GEO-5—in June, on the eve of the recent Rio+20 Conference on Sustainable Development in Brazil.
Produced over three years, in collaboration with some 600 experts worldwide, the document details global progress, or lack thereof, on a host of internationally agreed-upon goals to protect the planet and reverse a longstanding pattern of production and consumption of natural resources.
“If you look at these issues over several years, it can be overwhelming and discouraging,” says David López-Carr, professor of geography at University of California, Santa Barbara, director of the Human-Environment Dynamics (HED) lab, and a lead author on two of the report’s 17 chapters.
Click for a larger version of the UN Environmental Programme’s core set of environmental indicators. (Credit: UNEP)
Straight from the Source
“But learning takes time, and patience truly is a virtue. Many of the debates we have now are over things we weren’t even talking about 40 years ago. So we do see areas of progress.”
With Kostas Goulias, a UCSB geography professor and transportation expert, and Matthew Gluschankoff, an undergraduate who works in the HED lab, López-Carr helped write the opening substantive chapter to the GEO-5, “Drivers,” about what causes environmental change.
Population and consumption are deemed the primary drivers. High population growth in remote rural areas such as sub-Saharan Africa—and the impact that such demographic transition is likely to have on human well-being and environmental integrity—remains an especially “under-recognized” issue, López-Carr says.
“These areas are particularly vulnerable to climate change because they have a direct dependence on the environment for subsistence and livelihoods in a way that we do not,” he says. “When breakdowns in commodity pathways change for us, they are very quickly replaced by another.
“But breakdowns in subsistence pathways are less resilient to shocks to the system. They are much more local, and people are surviving on local resources through dint of their own labor. When a breakdown happens to them they have to deal with it immediately, in their environment, without the benefit of the global system that we have.”
Former UCSB visiting scholar Narcisa Pricope, an assistant geography professor at Southern Oregon University, leant her expertise in the emerging concern over drylands to the chapter “Land,” alongside López-Carr, who focused on population, agricultural and forest transitions, and policy implications.
Among other insights, they reveal that competing demands for fuel, food, feed, fiber, and raw materials are intensifying pressures on land—and that globalization and urbanization are further aggravating those demands.
“My overall sense is that things will get worse for land before they get better,” López-Carr says. “I would be delightfully but significantly surprised if, in 10 years, we had more forest conservation, reversed soil decline, and enhanced farmland sustainability.”
As much about finding solutions as it is about exposing problems, the GEO-5 also offers big-picture policy suggestions and identifies small changes with the potential for big impact––from supporting universal primary education and health care, and improving governance and capacity building, to reducing consumption of red meat.
López-Carr describes the latter recommendation as “a win-win for human health and the environment.”
More news from UC Santa Barbara: http://www.ucsb.edu/