Share this article

 Email

 Print

 

Republish this article

The text of this article by Futurity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License.

More
Earth & Environment

Road trip maps greenhouse gas across US

Are Europe’s wild bees bouncing back?

Thawing Arctic keeps its grip on carbon

Lack of biodiversity could topple fisheries

Marcellus Shale fracking: Is well water really clean?

Massive Cascadia quake on the horizon?

Clawed frogs spread deadly amphibian fungus

No signs of fracking fluids in Arkansas drinking water

Fracking’s rewards come with risks, survey shows

Listen to this story on EarthSky.org.

The study, published this month in the journal Environmental Science and Technology, makes use of a novel but highly effective sampling technique: measuring concentrations of the chemicals in the bark of trees, which absorbs compounds in both vapor and particle phases.

“These findings illustrate further that flame retardants are ubiquitous pollutants and are found all around the world, not only in biota and humans but also in plants,” says study co-author Amina Salamova, a research associate in the School of Public and Environmental Affairs at Indiana University Bloomington.

The study measured concentrations of brominated and chlorinated flame retardants collected in tree bark samples at 12 locations around the globe: three sites in Canada and single sites in Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Czech Republic, South Africa, Nepal, Indonesia, Tasmania, and American Samoa.

The highest concentrations were found at an urban site: Downsview, Ontario, Canada, near Toronto. However, the second-highest concentration of one type of flame retardant, Dechlorane Plus, was found at a remote site at Bukit Kototabang in Indonesia. Researchers don’t know the cause of the relatively high concentrations at the site but suspect it may be near a source.

Brominated and chlorinated flame retardants have been used for several decades in consumer products made of plastic, foam, wood, and textiles to prevent combustion and slow the spread of fire. They persist in the environment and bio-accumulate in ecosystems and in human tissues.

Exposure to the compounds has been associated with thyroid and other endocrine system disruption and with adverse neurological development. As a result, the production and use of certain flame retardants has been restricted in North America and the European Union.

Researchers measured a variety of flame retardants, including widely used polybrominated diphenyl ethers, or PBDE, as well as nonregulated compounds such as Dechlorane Plus and “older” flame retardants that were used in the 1980s.

Findings include:

• Most of the compounds were detected at all the locations, with concentrations varying widely.

• Concentrations were associated with population density, suggesting the compounds most likely entered the environment through their use in nearby homes and offices.

• Concentrations found in tree bark are correlated with those measured in previous atmospheric sampling at the sites by the Global Atmospheric Passive Sampling network.

• Higher concentrations of flame retardants in bark and the atmosphere have been found by Hites and others in previous studies of the Great Lakes region, especially urban areas near Chicago and Cleveland, and also at cities in China.

Even higher concentrations were found in southern Arkansas and at Niagara Falls, New York, near the sites of manufacturing facilities for PBDE and Dechlorane Plus, respectively.

The study also confirms the effectiveness of using tree bark as a sampling medium, a technique that Hites and colleagues have used in previous studies of persistent organic pollutants such as flame retardants.

Bark makes an effective sampling medium because of its large surface area and high lipid content. The samples are easy and inexpensive to collect, an advantage in developing countries that lack funding for extensive environmental monitoring programs. Tree bark also collects both vapor and particle phase pollutants, while other samplers collect one or the other.

Support for the study came from the Great Lakes National Program Office of the US Environmental Protection Agency. Professor Ronald A. Hites of the department of chemistry is a co-author of the study, which was carried out in cooperation with the Global Atmospheric Passive Sampling network, an international monitoring initiative established in 2004 on six continents.

Source: Indiana University