Earth & Environment - Posted by Karen Marvin-Stanford on Monday, July 23, 2012 11:11 - 0 Comments
Eco-disaster: Reserves help oceans recover
STANFORD (US) — Protected pockets of ocean that are off limits to fishing, known as marine reserves, help entire ecosystems bounce back after an environmental disaster, new research shows.
Researchers studying abalones found that after a mass mortality of marine life in the waters off Baja California, Mexico, egg production of pink abalones was cut in half in fishing areas but increased by 40 percent in the marine reserves. Further, a significant amount of larvae spilled over into unprotected areas open to fishing, which helped them rebound more quickly, according to findings reported in the journal PLos One.
The study, which began in 2006, used data from abalone fishing areas around Isla Natividad, Mexico, including new marine reserves that were hard hit in both 2009 and 2010 by hypoxic events, episodes of low dissolved oxygen in seawater that weaken and kill marine life.
Straight from the Source
“Our study preceded the 2009 mortality event, allowing us an unprecedented view of its demographic effects, both within the reserve and in fished areas,” says Fiorenza “Fio” Micheli, professor of biological sciences at Stanford University.
The study discovered that after the 2009 hypoxic event, abalone biomass declined by 75 percent at fished sites but only 50 percent in reserves. Perhaps more important, it found that the recruitment rate (the rate at which abalone are ready to be harvested) of juveniles in the reserves remained stable but were nine times lower in fished areas. “Both the large size of the protected abalones and the population density were key to resilience,” notes Micheli. “Marine reserves are vital to jumpstart the recovery of species following a mass mortality.”
The Isla Natividad marine reserves were established by the local fishing cooperatives after seeing sharp declines in abalone catches due to fishing and past El Niño events. Climate change is happening on a global scale, leaving many communities with few options to protect their local ecosystems and the livelihoods that are dependent on them. The establishment of marine protected areas, including marine reserves, is one option available to local communities even while global climate change mitigation continues to be debated.
“Historically governments and communities had to make a leap of faith that a marine reserve could provide long-term benefits that offset the short-term loss of fishing grounds,” Micheli says. “There were no studies or scientific evidence that a marine reserve could help a region of the ocean bounce back from a local environmental disaster. Now we have that evidence.”
The study focused on abalone because of their high commercial value and because their populations have been depleted in recent years. Since the mid-1800s, the herbivorous mollusk has been harvested around the North Pacific, leading to a decline in the total catch of all five species from a high of 24,000 metric tons to 115 metric tons in 1995.
Since 1997, both commercial and sport fishing of abalone has been closed south of San Francisco, Calif. Although commercial fishers pull $20 million of pink abalones annually from the waters off Baja California, recent years netted 10 times smaller catches than the peak year.
The hypoxic events affecting abalone populations are relatively new developments along the western coast of North America. Recent research indicates that midwater Oxygen Minimum Zones are expanding, setting the stage for future hypoxic events. This, combined with other environmental impacts such as an increase in mean ocean temperatures, lends scientific support to recommendations for the establishment of networks of marine protected areas to help offset environmental impacts.
More news from Stanford University: http://news.stanford.edu/