Earth & Environment - Posted by A'ndrea Elyse Messer-Penn State on Thursday, June 30, 2011 12:58 - 3 Comments    
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Culture drives attitudes about climate

Perception of how behavior affects the environment influences what actions people take to protect it. If they don't believe an action—like car pooling—will make a substantial difference, they are less likely to participate in it. (Credit: iStockphoto)

PENN STATE (US) — Consumerism and contraception have a significant impact on people’s attitudes about climate change, according to a new study.


“Engaging in one type of environmentally friendly behavior can predispose one to engage in similar behaviors, inhibit other behaviors, or even increase environmentally harmful behaviors,” says Janet Swim, professor of psychology at Penn State.

The research, published in the journal American Psychologist, finds that growing consumption and growing population factor into the state of the environment as they both substantially increase carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere.

People’s perceptions of how their behavior affects the environment influences how they act, Swim says. If people don’t believe that the choices they make will substantially improve the environment, then they are less likely to participate in activities like recycling, turning off lights when leaving a room, or car pooling.

Some behaviors offset environmental gains. If a family buys a fuel-efficient vehicle but chooses to drive more miles than they previously did, there is no gain for the environment. Also, while the average U.S. household size is decreasing, Americans are generally choosing to live in larger homes, counteracting the energy savings on heating and cooling that could be made in smaller spaces.

Decisions about environmental consumption and behaviors that use environmental resources are influenced by culture as well as an individual’s abilities and motivations, Swim says.

Some cultural factors are structural. As people began moving further away from city centers, cars become important for transportation. Other cultural factors, however, influence perceived needs and desires. The types of cars people drive and how fast people drive influence how much gasoline is consumed. People’s cars and speed are often both influenced by advertising and others’ purchasing and driving behaviors.

People adjust their explanations for behaviors in ways that allow them to maintain their consumer lifestyles. Carpool lanes decrease carbon dioxide emissions and lower costs of commuting. But an earlier study, found that prior to the existence of carpool lanes commuters said carpooling was too expensive. After carpool lanes were available, commuters were surveyed again and reported that flexibility prevented them from carpooling.

Contraceptive use is also influenced by cultural and individual abilities and needs. Population growth in India has in part been attributed to the importance placed on male children, creating a cultural need to have more children in order to increase the number of sons.

Individually people often consider the emotional value of children when determining how many children to have. However in some circumstances people consider the environmental effects as well, Swim says.

“For example, in Nepal if people felt that “environmental destruction had influenced their agricultural productivity (they) were more likely to use contraceptives.”

Researchers from the College of Wooster and the University of Notre Dame contributed to the study.

More news from Penn State: http://live.psu.edu/

Please wait

3 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Richard D. Stacy
Jun 30, 2011 14:11

What this post is saying can be shortened to: “Life on planet earth is complex”.

Mark Fyten
Jun 30, 2011 16:06

What this article says is that people will act to further their own self-interest and to perpetuate their beliefs.
This entire study was unnecessary and ineffectual. The conclusions boil down to “common sense” I would have been happy to provide these conclusions for half of what this study cost to produce. Next time, call me first.

st Louis
Aug 21, 2011 14:17

Most people don’t understand they are constantly either gaining fat, or losing fat. There is no in-between. Some people justify binging or giving up because they hit a small road-block. This isn’t an all or nothing game. For example, when I was overweight, if I ate an unhealthy lunch, I’d go ahead and eat an unhealthy dinner since I already “messed up” the day. Or I’d say, I’ll start eating healthy on Monday since I’ve already eaten poorly this weekend. Every person at times eats too much.

Leave a Comment

Comment

Research news from leading universities

Daily E-News


Follow Futurity

RSS feedsFacebookTwitter

Week's Most Discussed

  • Loading...

Media Partners

Alltop logo EarthSky logo Pulse logo Flipboard logo The Conversation logo

Browse By School