Earth & Environment - Posted by Tom Oswald-Michigan State on Wednesday, June 13, 2012 11:51 - 1 Comment
Climate debate tackles population growth
MICHIGAN STATE / STANFORD (US) — A new study forecasts that as Earth’s human population continues to grow, increased consumption—and increased emissions—are to come.
In an article published in the journal Nature Climate Change, Thomas Dietz of Michigan State University and his colleague, Eugene Rosa of Washington State University, take a critical look at the various factors that have long been prime climate-change suspects. One in particular: The role of population growth.
“How does population growth influence greenhouse gas emissions?” Dietz asks. “Well, in looking at most nations of the world during the last few decades we find that for each 1 percent increase in population, we get a bit more than a 1 percent increase in emissions.”
Straight from the Source
And with the Earth’s population projected to reach 10 billion by the end of this century, “it unquestionably will add to the stress we place on the planet,” Dietz says.
Until recently, climate-change debate had focused on whether it was brought about by human activity. Recently that debate has shifted to what sorts of activities are creating it.
“No single factor acts independently of the others,” says Dietz, a professor of sociology and environmental science and policy, and assistant vice president for environmental research. “The effect of population size depends on consumption; the effects of consumption depend on how many people are consuming at that level.”
Another factor that has sparked climate-change debate focuses on how affluent a nation is. On one hand it’s argued that more affluent nations use more resources, thus creating more emissions.
On the other hand, citizens of more affluent nations tend to be more socially conscious and are willing to work and pay for a cleaner environment.
“For example,” Dietz says, “increased use of electricity generated by renewable sources that do not emit greenhouse gases might partially or wholly compensate for the tendency toward increased emissions that come with increased affluence.”
Dietz and Rosa write that they are not optimistic about the future, calling the paper they wrote “sobering.”
“The population and economic growth that can be anticipated in coming decades will tend to push emissions substantially upward,” they write.
The only possible saving grace, they say, is improved technology and changes in the way humans use resources.
“However, these changes will need to be huge because they must counter substantial increases in scale coming from population growth and especially increasing affluence.”
Rosa is a visiting scholar at Stanford University’s Woods Institute for the Environment.
More news from Michigan State University: http://news.msu.edu/