Sikhote_Alin_meteorite_525

Did phosphorous from space spark life on Earth?

U. LEEDS (UK) — Experiments suggest that unusual phosphorus chemicals from meteorites could have given power to Earth’s “primordial soup.”

While it is generally accepted that some important ingredients for life came from meteorites bombarding the early Earth, scientists have not been able to explain how that inanimate rock transformed into the building blocks of life.


“If Curiosity has found phosphorus in one of the forms we produced in Iceland, this may indicate that conditions on Mars were at one point suitable for the development of life in much the same way we now believe it developed on Earth,” says Terry Kee. (Credit: ©James McKay 2013)

This new study shows how a chemical, similar to one now found in all living cells and vital for generating the energy that makes something alive, could have been created when meteorites containing phosphorus minerals landed in hot, acidic pools of liquids around volcanoes, which were likely to have been common across the early Earth.

“The mystery of how living organisms sprung out of lifeless rock has long puzzled scientists, but we think that the unusual phosphorus chemicals we found could be a precursor to the batteries that now power all life on Earth. But the fact that it developed simply, in conditions similar to the early Earth, suggests this could be the missing link between geology and biology,” says study leader Terry Kee of the University of Leeds’ school of chemistry.

All life on Earth is powered by a process called chemiosmosis, in which the chemical adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the rechargeable chemical “battery” for life, is both broken down and re-formed during respiration to release energy used to drive the reactions of life, or metabolism.

The complex enzymes required for both the creation and break down of ATP are unlikely to have existed on the Earth during the period when life first developed. This led scientists to look for a more basic chemical with similar properties to ATP, but that does not require enzymes to transfer energy.

Phosphorus is the key element in ATP, and other fundamental building blocks of life like DNA, but the form it commonly takes on Earth, phosphorus (V), is largely insoluble in water and has a low chemical reactivity.

The early Earth, however, was regularly bombarded by meteorites and interstellar dust rich in exotic minerals, including the far more reactive form of phosphorus, the iron-nickel-phosphorus mineral schreibersite.

‘Chemical life’

The scientists simulated the impact of such a meteorite with the hot, volcanically-active early Earth by placing samples of the Sikhote-Alin meteorite, an iron meteorite which fell in Siberia in 1947, in acid taken from the Hveradalur geothermal area in Iceland. The rock was left to react with the acidic fluid in test tubes incubated by the surrounding hot spring for four days, followed by a further 30 days at room temperature.

In their analysis of the resulting solution the scientists found the compound pyrophosphite, a molecular “cousin” of pyrophosphate—the part of ATP responsible for energy transfer. The scientists believe this compound could have acted as an earlier form of ATP in what they have dubbed “chemical life.”

“Chemical life would have been the intermediary step between inorganic rock and the very first living biological cell. You could think of chemical life as a machine—a robot, for example, is capable of moving and reacting to surroundings, but it is not alive,” says Kee.

“With the aid of these primitive batteries, chemicals became organized in such a way as to be capable of more complex behavior and would have eventually developed into the living biological structures we see today.”

Phosphorus on Mars

The team from NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL-Caltech) working on the Curiosity rover, which landed on Mars in August last year, has recently reported the presence of phosphorus on the Red Planet.

“If Curiosity has found phosphorus in one of the forms we produced in Iceland, this may indicate that conditions on Mars were at one point suitable for the development of life in much the same way we now believe it developed on Earth,” adds Kee.

The researchers at Leeds are now working with colleagues at JPL-Caltech to understand how these early batteries and the “chemical life” they became part of might have developed into biological life.

As part of this work they will be using facilities currently used to test new fuel cells to build a “geological fuel cell” using minerals and gases common on the early Earth. Researchers will apply different chemicals to its surface and monitor the reactions take place and the chemical products that develop.

The team also hopes to travel to Disko Island in Greenland, home to the Earth’s only naturally-occurring source of schreibersite, the mineral found in the Sikhote-Alin meteorite. There, they hope to repeat their experiments and show that the same chemicals develop in an entirely Earth-originated setting.

The paper appears in the journal Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta.

The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Leverhulme Trust, Science and Technology Facilities Council, and the UK Space Agency funded the research.

Source: University of Leeds

chat5 Comments

You are free to share this article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported license.

5 Comments

  1. sort of knocks the Genesis story out of the ball park

    The stories in the Bible have actual causes, For instance it was probably a meteorite that caused the destruction of Sodom.

  2. Edward

    Stanley Miller 1953 showed that given the conditions on early earth monomers will form spontaneously. There is no mystery here.

  3. Giridhar Kalidasu

    Around 0.1 to 0.15% of P is present in diiferent forms in earths crust. It is all probabale that there was no need P to be from meteorites. More justification is needed for such studies.

  4. D.E.J

    First off, no-one said Genesis should be taken literally; indeed it for the most part shouldn’t be.
    Second, there is no evidence whatsoever that a meteor powerful enough to destroy an entire city struck in the area of Israel 4000 years ago or so.

    And third, it is a well established fact a non-living thing cannot create life, “(1) The cell is the unit of structure for all living things; (2) The cell is the unit of function for all living things; (3) All cells arise only from other living cells.” That is what the cell theory states. This is why their study is pointless. Their atheist beliefs are ruining whatever scientific studies they are doing. Let’s face it; all life came from God. You can’t get life (cells) from anything other than another cell, no chemical or nuclear reaction can give you life. People (and not just common folk, scientists too) once believed life could come from non-living things, that is called “spontaneous generation”. It was proved wrong on numerous occasions, by unarguable tests. “From nothing, nothing comes.” To stay true to real, unbiased science, you need to accept that God started everything off.

  5. Henri

    D.E.J. – yes, let’s just ‘accept’ that G@d is the source of everything…all life and matter in the Universe.
    Thanks for the G@dma…

We respect your privacy.