Researchers used specially filtered vacuum cleaners to collect dust in 155 rooms—offices, classrooms, hallways, bathrooms, and storage closets—to develop a microbial snapshot of a campus building, based on where people congregated, how people used indoor spaces, and how these spaces were connected to allow human movement between them.
In the latest issue of PLOS ONE, a team of biologists and architects report that proteobacteria, fermicutes, and deinococci dominate the building, but these communities vary with architectural choices. The researchers conclude that their findings “give clear evidence that design choices can influence the biogeography of microbial communities indoors.”
The study is part of the University of Oregon Biology and the Built Environment (BioBE) Center’s efforts to explore the microbiome of the indoor world, where people spend the majority of their time.
Microbiome refers to the total makeup of microorganisms and their collective genetic material found in or on the human body or in another environment.
The team analyzed DNA from more than 30,000 different types of bacteria throughout the Lillis Business Complex. “We found that what you do in a room, how many people there are in a room, and how many different people are in a room all make a big difference,” says James Meadow, a postdoctoral research associate in the BioBE center.
“Even an office with one person year round versus a classroom with hundreds of people throughout the year will have different kinds of bacteria.”
The samples were collected from the complex’s centerpiece, Lillis Hall—an airy, 136,000-square-foot facility, which has mechanical air ventilation throughout most of the building, except for a wing of offices where occupants wanted window ventilation.
The team chose the building for the study because of its variety of different uses and its flexible operation. For example, Lillis Hall can accommodate both mechanical and natural air ventilation, allowing researchers to observe whether ventilation influences indoor bacterial communities.
Most of the bacteria that were found came as no surprise, Meadow says. “These are found about everywhere we look, inside or outside, and we found some of the same types of bacteria that you would expect to find living in soil and on plants. That tells us that some of the bacteria in buildings are likely being brought in with occupants and with outdoor air—but not equally in all rooms.”
For instance, the researchers found that soil- and plant-associated bacteria were most common in unoccupied spaces, such as mechanical rooms and storage closets.
Several different human-gut-associated bacteria, including lactobacillus, staphylococcus, and clostridium, were most common in bathroom dust. The researchers found that bathrooms accumulate the most distinctive bacterial communities, likely because of their unique function. They did not screen for disease-causing forms of bacteria.
Lots of ‘oddballs’
Deinococcus, whose members are known for their resilience when exposed to radiation and dry conditions, were the “oddballs” in the mix, Meadow says. “They are super tough and can hang out in harsh conditions, and buildings present some harsh conditions. But they were some of the most common bacteria in the building.
“They were found in all rooms, but more abundant in mechanically ventilated—versus naturally ventilated—rooms. That might suggest that they are accumulating over time while other bacteria dry out and die in buildings.”
Naturally ventilated rooms, on the other hand, were associated with more plant- and soil-associated bacteria, like methylobacterium. “A simple choice of where your air comes from in a building can influence the types of bacteria that you encounter,” Meadow says.
“This is a relatively new research area,” he says. “We don’t really have a list of bacteria that we know that we should come into contact with—such as the top 20 good bugs or the top 20 bad bugs, except for maybe a few pathogens. At some point, we will, and this research helps us understand how architecture and occupant behavior can contribute to a healthier indoor microbiome.”
Co-authors of the study contributed from the University of Quenbec, Montreal, and the University of Oregon. The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation’s Microbiology of the Built Environment program funded the work.
Source: University of Oregon