Birds trail climate in north-bound shift
CORNELL / YALE (US) — New research shows that birds are moving their habitats north in response to climate warming, but not quickly enough.
As warmer winter temperatures become more common, one way for some animals to adjust is to shift their ranges northward. But a new study of 59 North American bird species indicates that doing so is not easy or quick—it took about 35 years for many birds to move far enough north for winter temperatures to match where they historically lived.
“This is a problem, because birds are among the most mobile of animals, and yet they take decades to respond to warming,” says Frank La Sorte, a postdoctoral researcher at the Cornell University Lab of Ornithology and lead author of the study, which is published online by the Journal of Animal Ecology this month.
“Climatic conditions are steadily moving northward, whether particular animals come along or not. As conservation biologists we need to know how well animals are keeping up.”
Earlier studies of responses to climate change examined shifts in species’ geographic ranges. “Our work adds important realism and a temporal dimension to these models for a critical aspect of climate: minimum winter temperature,” says co-author Walter Jetz of Yale University.
The researchers used 35 years of data from the North American Christmas Bird Count to match winter temperatures to where birds were seen. They tested 59 bird species individually and found that they responded differently to climate change. When summarized across bird species, there was evidence for a strong delay lasting about 35 years.
For example, black vultures have spread northward in the last 35 years and now winter as far north as Massachusetts, where the minimum winter temperature is similar to what it was in Maryland in 1975. On the other hand, the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker did not alter its range at all despite the warming trend, possibly because its very specific habitat requirements precluded a range shift.
Both of these scenarios could represent problems for birds, La Sorte says. Species that do not track changes in climate may wind up at the limits of their physiological tolerance, or they may lose important habitat qualities, such as favored food types, as those species pass them by. But they also can’t move their ranges too fast if the habitat conditions they depend on also tend to lag behind climate.
“When you think about it, it makes sense that species move slower than the rate at which climate is changing,” La Sorte says. “They’re not just tracking temperature—many of them need to follow a prey base, a type of vegetation, or they need certain kinds of habitat that will create corridors for movement.”
Variability in climate warming is likely to affect how species respond, too, La Sorte says. If warming trends weaken, as they did over the past few years, birds may be able to catch up. But accelerated warming, which is likely as global carbon emissions continue to increase, may put additional strain on birds.
The study highlights these challenges and the high potential climate change has for disrupting natural systems. It also underscores the challenges ecologists face in predicting the long-term consequences of climate change for many species simultaneously.
The study was supported by the National Science Foundation.
More news from Cornell University: www.news.cornell.edu